Skip Navigation

I think smug chuds are slightly more annoying than smug libs

Especially now. Like who do conservatives think they are by telling libs to go outside, or to quit watching the news? Their two favorite guys are Doland Trump and Elon Musk, the two most belligerent and news obsessed ghoul in America. They live off negative attention. The Republicans just spent two weeks shuffling a bunch of executive orders that might as well have been called the "trigger libs" acts.

Like you brought this on yourself, chuds. You can't rile up libs on purpose and then act all high and mighty about it, just lean into it. Don't pretend you're taking the high road here. If you wanna trigger the libs own up to it, don't pretend Trump is just a normal dude who's unfairly maligned and blah blah. Don't clutch your pearls over how the media talks about him.

Of course they go after Trump, because he's a goofy clown who says funny and weird things. So that's the reaction he'll get. Chuds want so badly to be the dominant cultural force, they wanna be seen as calm and normal and yet they also wanna be giggling jesters who always have libs to trigger

Sorry I just had to get this out. All my reactionary relatives have become 75% more annoying in a mirror image to how stuck-up libs act.

17 comments
  • Whoever is most annoying is consistent with who is in power.

    Biden kissasses turn into performatively radical radlibs overnight, which is at least superficially less obnoxious than the :vote: to save democracy spiel they've been doing.

    Meanwhile chuds switch to dunk mode which is infuriating because they're cheerleading for so much unnecessary suffering and feel empowered to take cheap shots whenever possible.

  • Tbh I’ve gone back and forth on this and have concluded that the most annoying are the ones you need to deal with on a daily basis. However in the liberals’ defense I will say that I can usually hold a normal, non political conversation with even the most pretentious of liberals, whereas chuds tend to insert every grievance of theirs into everything and are often just impossible to talk to.

    The most annoying right now to me though are the chuds who don’t like trump. Not never trumpers, but the conservatives for whom Trump was the lesser evil. Chuds fucking suck as you say, liberal anti-Trump politics can be annoying but it’s generally well intentioned and I can find common ground with it. But with lesser evilism chuds, they’ll do the same shit you’re describing above, owning the libs constantly, but then trump does something that no one likes, like these tariffs rn. And suddenly these people are on your side. My dad is doing that rn. He’ll celebrate all the “ending DEI” crap, but then trump institutes these tariffs and it’s all “hey don’t blame me I don’t like the guy!” Like stfu and own your decision

    • Oh yeah, I can at least talk with libs. With conservatives it's a never ending firehose of woke woke DEI trans woke bud light. Just inscrutable things and neuroses.

      I mostly have to deal with conservatives in my day to day life, so you're probably right in that's what I find more annoying. They're all my coworkers.

    • chuds tend to insert every grievance of theirs into everything and are often just impossible to talk to.

      Yeah this is something I've found to be the case. They are incapable of talking about any sort of hobby or movie or whatever because they only do chud shit like guns, doomscrolling Facebook, and watching Fox News. They're also the same types who complain about "Everything has become so political!" when that's their only source of entertainment.

      Immediately when they enter a space, they bring up politics and expect you to listen to their sermon. Then they get all pissy if you push back or disengage.

      I still hate libs more because libs enable chuds by being complete doormats.

  • Like you brought this on yourself, chuds. You can't rile up libs on purpose and then act all high and mighty about it, just lean into it. Don't pretend you're taking the high road here. If you wanna trigger the libs own up to it, don't pretend Trump is just a normal dude who's unfairly maligned and blah blah. Don't clutch your pearls over how the media talks about him.

    IMO it's the same level of condescension, but it's covered up in a layer of "Heh, you've fallen for my bait, lib

    " type of 'humour'

  • Yeah, the average chud is. That said, the real dedicated "I am a Liberal" liberals are worse. You know, the ones that openly admit that the "Rules-based order" is a stalking horse of US hegemony with no real meaning, and that that is good, actually.

  • i think chuds are still more evil but on a day to day basis i barely ever run into them either online or irl whereas everybody is a lib so its easier for me to forget how evil the chuds are tbh

    • Yeah that's such a different experience than me. I don't think I met a single lib until I was in college and even nowadays I rarely encounter one. I live in Texas though

  • I think IRL for me there's a lot less smug chuds then there are smug libs. A large percentage of people just have ambient chud beliefs, and the libs are always smug.

  • With regards to chuds, I think they are more annoying because they tend to be sore winners. They huff and puff no matter if they win or lose. Which is exactly why it is beyond stupid that the libs in positions of power always try to work with them (while we repeatedly see how it is a one-way street when the right wins). Though I am starting to be more pissed off with the new phase of libs acting like they have been the ones doing and saying shit we have done and said no matter which fake party is in control. I dread the next election cycle because now the dems will try even less and triple down on expecting a blow-out win from the republicans actually doing shit they yell about scaring people. So much not looking forward to even more "nice words" and zero actions like the Obama years. Also not looking forward to the new excuses as to why they "can't just do shit because insert fake reasons that involve bipartisanship."

17 comments