Canon is wrong, dragonborn have tails
69 1 Replythe official canon states that tieflings can't be purple, and yet the official artwork for a tiefling is a purple tiefling
81 0 ReplyPossibly the most ignored sentence in the PHB, even by Wotc themselves:
Their skin tones cover the full range of human coloration, but also include various shades of red.
43 0 ReplyOfficial Dragonborn PHB description say Dragonborns are brown/rust coloured, with some being rust-copper green.
Artwork on the same page is a red scaled dragonborn.
34 3 Reply
This was settled years ago
39 0 ReplyTROGDOR THE BURNINATOR!
14 0 Reply
So they just have a scaly butt? I'm picturing a crocodile walking around except that instead of a tail it has butt cheeks like a human.
25 0 ReplyPermanently Deleted
50 1 Reply100% lore-accurate.
19 0 ReplyLike nothing at all
19 0 Reply
Another image I can hear thanks to Bill Wurtz.
21 0 ReplyI recognize that the council has made a decision, but given that it's a stupid-ass decision i've elected to ignore it.
15 0 ReplySpeaking as a person playing a soot-black tiefling...
13 0 ReplyThis is the real reason I stopped playing D&D. The OGL stuff was just a smoke screen.
10 0 ReplyWhy are Japan and Korea the same color on this map? 🤨
8 0 ReplyIt's a screen cap from a video talking about Japan's involvement in World War 2, where they invaded Korea.
25 0 ReplyThe video for those who are curious. Absolutely worth the 20 minutes.
3 0 Reply
Permanently Deleted
7 0 ReplyI got around this by being a Path of the Beast Barbarian Dragonborn. I was a Weredragon and when I Raged I became more dragon like. I almost exclusively used the tail function for the shield reaction while still messing people up with a Magic Maul.
8 1 ReplyYou want a tail, play a Kobold!
7 0 ReplyThis only became an issue when we defeated a half dragon non-lethally and the DM was making small talk with the dragonborn.
3 0 ReplyErm, tails are based, ofc my pc has one!
2 0 Reply