Community Notes vanishes from X feeds, raising 'serious questions' amid ongoing EU probe
Community Notes vanishes from X feeds, raising 'serious questions' amid ongoing EU probe
Serious question, why is any non-nazi posting on twitter?
Although insta has been making inroads, it was the default in Japan for a long time for govt info, shop notifications (bars, art galleries, you name it), as well as other customer interaction.
To use community notes
Ok, now that is actually funny. well played!
It such a large network and great at blasting information out. Lots of youtuber/livestreamers still have to eXcrete on x or less they loose their audience. And it's not just video, writers also depends on the big ole X megaphone to aunuce book releases, beta reader applications etc etc.
Honestly furry artists are probably the freest from X since they have so many of their own social media sites.
You X following even is part of the reason for publishers to pick up your book.
Add to that some police departments actually use to send amber alerts.
You just have the world's largest public megaphone in an attention based economy. People can't leave for anything smaller.
Great points, except:
People can’t leave for anything smaller.
They can and some do. It’s still a choice.
technically yes but if leaving means you loose half your income then is it really a choice.
Of course, but it needn’t be black and white. You can also diversify, make yourself less reliant on a single platform. And by doing so, enable your audience to follow you elsewhere. Or diversify into different activities altogether. And when it’s no longer half your income on the line, then switch.
But doing nothing and saying, “but half my income!”? That’s not only a choice, but also complacency.
True they could spend the extra time poating on blusky first. Thrn on Twitter with a note that all posts are posted first on blusky. Enough people do that it would move the audience. But then people need to care enough to spend that extra time and care about what platform is used. Moat people care Twitter in the same way they care about ipv4 vs ipv6 addresses. Sad but true.
Great, so make it a public utility.
For those people they should all contact the government agencies that are still on Twitter and demand they switch to Bluesky.
When is the last time you demanded a government agency do something that wasn't already their idea, and they did it
Or self host a mastodon server.
Bluesky is not a true alternative. Just recently there were news about them banning opposition accounts in Turkey.
Or mastodon.
Been using Mastodon for about two years now and never going back.
If people of your country is more likely to use Twitter, moving to Bluesky is not even realistic.
Also, for a lot of countries, moving to Bluesky is like moving from American controlled platform to the same American controlled platform.
I agree with the sentiment, but the action doesn’t do anything to address the immediate issue
Need is a strong word
It's legit applicable for people that have Twitter just for realtime earthquake warning.
At least its applicable for Indonesian users.
Some friends of mine also think Twitter just has better content to consume when scrolling through. Too comfy & don't care enough about who runs it & the issues to jump off. It gives them what they want.
It's becoming like Facebook, which is were people's parents, uncles and aunts and even grandparents (as well as technically inept organisations) are, but you yourself either moved on or are too young to have ever wanted to be there ("because nobody my age is there"), only whilst Facebook is merelly a Propaganda outlet for the Far Right, Twitter is openly Nazi.
Inertia, at least in some cases. It takes a lot of work to rebuild your audience. Leaving is accelerating, though, albeit slowly.
In other words, the so called "Networking Effects" (which have nothing to do with technical networks and are actually about how "people go were people are, so the more people are in a place the more people go there, the more people are there, the more people go there and so on") in the business of social networking that made a handful of players dominant, are very hard to revert.
Some people continue to gaslight themselves into thinking there is something to be gained from the audience they once had
critical mass probably
Tech people, especially AI researchers, refuse to leave.
Not everyone wants to only see a highly censored echo chamber.
Right so why post on Twitter then?
Because Twitter is the only social media site that isn’t a highly censored echo chamber.
Since Musk took over, the censorship requests went from 50% accepted to 80% accepted.
How do you know this?
It’s fucking unreal just how completely lost you magats are. Just fucking upside down in relation to any sort of reality.
This is just too hilarious. The people that are completely out of touch with reality are people like you who say things like this.
Says the guy who actually believes that felon musk doesn't censor the everliving fuck out of any sort of dissenting view on his privately owned nazi platform.
Just. wow.
But there are "dissenting views" all over X? Pro-Democrat policy and ideology views are not censored. Pro Trans/Palestine/Abortion/every-other-left-wing views are not being censored.
Which views are being censored on X in America? What evidence do you have to support your claim?
Whose being suppressed, do you have an example?
https://gizmodo.com/10-times-elon-musk-censored-twitter-users-1850570720
Do you think this is hard to find examples for?
Clearly, because even that article is bullshit and couldn't find 10 despite naming it "Elon Musk, King of Censorship: 10 Times the ‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Silenced Twitter Users" lol
Government ordered takedowns are not Twitter censoring people - it's the government.
As for "cis" and "cisgender" - they're considered slurs on there, but they're not censored. You can go on there and post "cisgender" as much as you want.
They operate within the law. If a government says you either ban an account in their country or you stop providing your service to the entire country, which do you think X should do? Because those are the options - follow the law or exit the country.
X are challenging the government legal orders in court btw, but in the meantime they have to cooperate. Like I said, the government are the ones censoring free speech here, not X. Do you not see the difference? To operate in a country you need to follow their laws. Not every country has free speech constitutionally guaranteed btw.
Thought people would recognize this username and start ignoring them by now. Stop feeding the trolls, kids.
I love to disagree with things
That's not censorship. You can still post with that word and it doesn't get deleted. It just won't get spread as far and wide. All your followers etc will still see it.
It just won’t get spread as far and wide.
It's being blocked from being read or seen, as per the definition. They are quite literally censoring a word for political reasons in line with their political agenda. Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.
Do you think they should classify the “n word” as a slur and limit its reach? Is that censorship?
Cis isn’t being blocked from being seen or read.
First, don't fall into the trap of confusing censorship with moderation. Second, don't confuse the world's richest man's sad attempt at fueling culture wars with plain racism.
I used to use Twitter and I know for a fact that it's literally being limited by not allowing it to be read or seen, appearing under one of those disclaimers at the bottom of a thread that was caught by the filter and in practice functions as a convenient dustbin to silence discourse. And you said it yourself, it's being treated differently by preventing its diffusion and visibility.
Or tell me, why is a neutral word like cisgender being censored at all? But spare me the gaslighting.
I know for a fact that it’s literally being limited by not allowing it to be read or seen
How do you know this? If you can't see it or read it, how do you know this?
And you said it yourself, it’s being treated differently by preventing its diffusion and visibility.
That isn't censorship.
Or tell me, why is a neutral word like cisgender being censored at all? But spare me the gaslighting.
Again - it's not being censored. You don't get posts removed for saying it. You don't get banned. The term is a controversial one, it's not "neutral". "Cisgender" has no need to even exist as a word. You don't need a word to mean "not trans", which is 99.99% of the population. The word "transgender" existing negates a need for "cisgender" to exist. "Cisgender" is really only ever used as an insult, which is why it's treated as such. There's no word for "not blind", because not being blind is the default, the standard.
First, don’t fall into the trap of confusing censorship with moderation.
It's funny you say that. Moderation that removes all differing opinions, and bans people who express them, is censorship. Limiting the reach of posts deemed "hateful", while not removing them or banning the person posting them, is not censorship.
How do you know this? If you can’t see it or read it, how do you know this?
Because it's been reported by the news that I cited.
That isn’t censorship.
It's the literal definition. Just because it's thinly veiled as a moderation measure by a billionaire doesn't mean that the core concept doesn't apply. Like I said, don't confuse it either way.
You don’t get posts removed for saying it. You don’t get banned.
And like I said, censorship is not only when your content gets removed or you get banned. You can have a similar effect with different mechanisms that effectively render content invisible, and I find it disingenuous of you not to consider that.
“Cisgender” has no need to even exist as a word.
You don’t need a word to mean “not trans”,
Brother, we have created entire fictional languages for less, and have names for concepts you can't even conceive of. Your argument is fragile. And your monolignualism is showing with those nearsighted takes.
“Cisgender” is really only ever used as an insult,
Cisgender has been thrown at Musk and his supporters because they treat it as an insult. Don't even. lol
Limiting the reach of posts deemed “hateful”, while not removing them or banning the person posting them, is not censorship.
It's most definitely a form of censorship, and I will die on this hill tonight.
And why are you here?
Based on their username and posts they are here to troll.
Yeah, he’s a really low effort bad faith troll that’s been basically just walking into conversations to sling shit everywhere for months. Not even worth interacting with.
Not trolling at all, just have different opinions to the echo chamber.
Being factually incorrect is not an opinion. It's being factually incorrect.
But knock yourself out: X does not censor, Earth is flat, whatever you want to believe...
I don't understand how I'm even reading your comments.. I guess the censor's sleeping. It is pretty late.
Because I can be. The fact that someone being on here with differing opinions upsets so many people is just a bonus.
Here you dropped this /s.
