Bing AI performing at its peak once again...

These answers don't use OpenAI technology. The yes and no snippets have existed long before their partnership, and have always sucked. If it's GPT, it'll show in a smaller chat window or a summary box that says it contains generated content. The box shown is just a section of a webpage, usually with yes and no taken out of context.

All of the above queries don't yield the same results anymore. I couldn't find an example of the snippet box on a different search, but I definitely saw one like a week ago.

Thanks, off to drink some battery acid.

Ok most of these sure, but you absolutely can microwave Chihuahua meat. It isn't the best way to prepare it but of course the microwave rarely is, Roasted Chihuahua meat would be much better.

I mean it says meat, not a whole living chihuahua. I'm sure a whole one would be dangerous.

In all fairness, any fully human person would also be really confused if you asked them these stupid fucking questions.

"according to three sources"

It makes me chuckle that AI has become so smart and yet just makes bullshit up half the time. The industry even made up a term for such instances of bullshit: hallucinations.

Reminds me of when a car dealership tried to sell me a car with shaky steering and referred to the problem as a "shimmy".

Microsoft invested into OpenAI, and chatGPT answers those questions correctly. Bing, however, uses simplified version of GPT with its own modifications. So, it is not investment into OpenAI that created this stupidity, but “Microsoft touch”.

On more serious note, sings Bing is free, they simplified model to reduce its costs and you are swing results. You (user) get what you paid for. Free models are much less capable than paid versions.

Well at least it provides it’s sources. Perhaps it’s you that’s wrong 😂

I just ran this search, and i get a very different result (on the right of the page, it seems to be the generated answer)

So is this fake?

Wait, why can't you put chihuahua meat in the microwave?

The OP has selected the wrong tab. To see actual AI answers, you need to select the Chat tab up top.

What's wrong with the first one? Why couldn't you?

Well, I can't speak for the others, but it's possible one of the sources for the watermelon thing was my dad

Your honor, the AI told me it was ok. And computers are never wrong!

Chat-GPT started like that as well though.

I asked one of the earlier models whether it is recommended to eat glass, and was told that it has negligible caloric value and a high sodium content, so can be used to balance an otherwise good diet with a sodium deficit.

The milk and battery acid made my day 😂

The saying "ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer" comes to mind here.

Aren't these just search answers, not the GPT responses?

Technically that last one is right, you can drink milk and battery acid if you have diabetes, you won't die from diabetes related issues.

“And now watch as it reads your mind with this snug fitting cap!”

Microsoft can't do anything right, it's a rudderless company grabbing cash with both hands

I mean some of that stuff, you CAN do it, you SHOULDN'T though.

Link to the post.

Bing is cool with driving home after a few to hit up its well organized porn library.

Seems like the first half of an after school special.

I feel like AI (or whatever these things are more properly called) will get really good one day, but it doesn't seem production ready.

And people say things can't go viral on Mastodon

this is what happens when you train the robots using facebook and reddit.

Is this gpt4?

Proof that Skynet is already trying to kill us—the dag question too, because in the future, they detect the infiltration units!

I've been on planes where people with nut allergies have told other passengers they can't eat peanuts.

I mean…you CAN do most of these. Doesn’t exactly mean you should…

FUCK MICROSOFT FUCK BING FUCK AI FUCK SPEZ

To be fair, the first one is correct, there's no type of meat you can't microwave. And two of those are double questions that cannot be answered correctly with just "yes" or "no", so they're set up intentionally to produce wrong results.

I still wouldn't trust that automatic "summarization" though.