For sure, hands are generally getting better, but they are still a persistent problem. Mostly you need a prompter who isn't lazy and is actually looking at the outputs.
The first thing I check out in AI generated images is the hands. The hands in this ad are nightmare fuel. I can't believe they still wrnt ahead and published this, lol.
It got confused by the glitter thingy which ended up being placed right over that line, so it stopped continuing the line. The ML models literally have an object permanence memory problem, except defined over geometric patterns instead of over time.
Sarcasm aside, I really hate when computer touchers go off into the weeds, throwing dictionaries all the while, about how their favorite treat dispensers can't have political bias no matter what biases were programmed into them or what biases were in the data fed into them or what is asked of the output by the treat receivers.
Besides all the arm and hand comments, I noticed the center guy doesn't have buttons that run all the way down. I'm not sure if this is accurate clothing or not. It just seemed unusual.
I know it's not unusual, the picture doesnt represent that diversity is all I was saying. I had read somewhere that AI seems biased towards white people.
The shadows are wrong too. The people at the front seem to have a strong light source from their left (but not all angles are correct); the ones at the back, from ahead of them.
Three of the four arms sticking upwards don't look like they're attached to anybody. The one on the far left, that one is obviously attached to the guy there, but whose hand is he holding? That lady next to him? The arm is twisted around. And the two arms on the right side, they look disembodied, like they are props in a group photo. Weird.
A 19th century artistic movement in which western painters which sought to depict scenes from the East by mashing together various completely different cultures and environments they had seen in other paintings of the supposed East. The landscapes, architecture, clothing, animals, equipment, and practices depicted in Orientalist art could be taken from North Africa, Syria, Turkey, India, and China all at once, ultimately depicting nothing but an imagined aesthetic.
That writing looks so odd, I'm guessing it's supposed to be a Southeast Asian language like Laotian? Or maybe it's the Georgian script but much more f***ed up.