How do Hollywood make a civil war movie and make it apolitical? LOOK AT HOW AWFUL THIS MAP IS!
You cannot make a civil war movie and it not be political the British guy who thought California and Texas would ever be allies needs to get fired. IF HE HAD ANY BRAVERY HE WOULD HAVE MADE THE PRESIDENT TRUMP!
Civil War is an upcoming dystopian action film, written and directed by Alex Garland. The film stars Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Stephen McKinley Henderson, Cailee Spaeny, Jesse Plemons, and Nick Offerman. The film follows a team of journalists who travel across the United States during the rapidly escalating Second American Civil War, which has engulfed the entire nation.
In the near future, a team of journalists travel across the United States during the rapidly escalating Second American Civil War that has engulfed the entire nation, between the American government and the separatist "Western Forces" led by Texas and California. The film documents the journalists struggling to survive during a time when the government has become a dystopian dictatorship and partisan extremist militias regularly commit war crimes.
partisan extremist militias regularly commit war crimes.
Oh, great. for the first time I bet it'll be horseshoe theory shown nationwide visually and graphically. There's no way there are liberal extremist militias.
My big problem with these post-apocalypse civil war scenarios is they still try and shoehorn in ideology when that’s likely to play very little part in that scenario especially. For example, these maps always split Utah and Nevada because “Mormons” and “Sin City”… but those two states are tied together in a lot of material ways (economy, interstate migration, etc) and would be much more likely to work together, since the Rockies really are almost like a small ocean.
So in theory, could CA and TX align? Yeah, maybe? But I don’t see any sort of material base for that assumption.
Nevada, Arizona, and Utah are also red desert states that rely on the Colorado river. They’d likely unite to fight California and New Mexico in order to invade Colorado to secure their treats and lawns.
Or Utah/Nevada would have an internal conflict and one of the two ideological forces would prevail over the other and coerce the other to adopt its customs while continuing to utilize the material, economic connection.
Texas would've immediately invaded every state in the "Florida alliance" and incorporated them
California and Washington state would remain loyal, but Washington state would get jumped by the so-called "western forces", and would need to be saved by California, turning Oregon into a bloody battlezone in the process
Nevada would run to California to save itself from being eaten alive by the Dark Mormon Empire, who will sacrifice the entire population of Arizona to summon a massive daemon army to conquer Texas and California
The Feds would maintain control of the Tide Water, but there would be a massive insurgency in rural areas
Tennessee, Iowa, Missouri, New Mexico, Nebraska, Georgia, and Oregon would become battlezones where the majority of the "conventional" fighting is done, practically every other state will see rural vs urban insurgencies
i mean, i'm gonna watch the flick because i liked his vision for Annihilation and several of his other movies. but i don't see how any florida breakaway project would not involve South Carolina, but would get... Oklahoma? or maybe it's unfair to assume any coherence to some "first days of collapse" map, since state borders are imaginary and what such a map (one that only shows state borders) would really reflect is national guard movements, military bases, and power projection over de facto state capitals being extrapolated outward to historic borders. so basically, nonsense.
like the SC/GA split bothers me, but Parris Island, SC is right there, so maybe there's a logic obscured by this mosaic.