Todd Howard: 'We Don't Need to Rush' Next Fallout Game

Who cares? Bethesda is long past the point of developing a good game.

They could take all the time in the world and it would still be shit because their formula for game development is pathetic.

I won't discount them unless an Elder Scrolls or Fallout game drops and is garbage. 76 has turned around into an actually enjoyable experience, for instance. At the same time I don't particularly care if a studio pumps out good or bad as there will still be idiots preordering and buying day 1. I am more than happy to wait for the reviews. A good game is a good game, and a bad one, bad. Who develops it makes no real difference apart from an expectation.

Thaaaat saaaid: Todd, my dude, you do actually need to hurry up. A great entry into the Fallout universe would restore some of the old faith you have caused to fall away.
- won't discount them unless an Elder Scrolls or Fallout game drops and is garbage
  
  It was called Starfield and it dropped last September
- This is one point I contend with: Fallout 76 didn't become good with patches. I'm not unconvinced that there's a conspiracy for Bethesda to create the impression online that the game became good with updates.
  
  That's just me though.
I haven't tried Starfield because it's still getting patched, but Bethesda games are some of my favorites. Yes they're janky and everything but I love exploring and looting and they really nail that.
- There are some films I enjoy which are objectively bad, and that's okay.
  
  If people want to enjoy Bethesda games, it's fine, each to their own.
  
  However, if you want to talk about game design, there is a lot of evidence which supports the claim that Bethesda don't know what makes a (objectively) good game anymore.
  
  Unfortunately, Bethesda are the only ones in town who are capitalising on "Bethesda style games". (With the exception of a few, like The Outer Worlds, and Cyberpunk 2077).
  
  Bethesda's strong suit is their physical world building - but everything else has been getting worse.
  
  The running joke is that the players mod the game to fix after launch. Except it's not a joke, and it's really not funny when the devs actually expect the community to fix their game. They could simply pay someone to implement every single fix from the UFO4P and UESSP, but choose not to. They do not care about quality.
- Never play Starfield; it'll make you hate Bethesda, especially Emil Pagliarulo (the lead designer and writer of the story).
  
  I used to feel the same way as you, until I played it. Now I have zero interest in anything Bethesda has coming out in the future. They've proven to me that they're incapable of making a modern game with a good story. Only thing that would convince me to play another title of theirs is if they finally ditch Gamebryo and never let Emil in the writer's room ever again, two things that'll never happen.
- They patched it, with paid mods
- I really like Starfield. It's not perfect, but it's great.
Come on now, let's be honest : as long as the community keep doing the work for them, their games will be popular. All they gotta do is make it easy to make mods and the jankiness and stupid decisions can be patched over and made into something great that actually pleases everybody, because everybody can decide to fix what they want.

The problem is their delusion that people love their games as they are.
- Even this is a stretch to be honest. Their games aren't easy to mod. Minor updates break shit. You need to consider mod load order. You need to "clean" the base files before loading in any big mods.
  
  Their games are made of fucking speghetti code and they don't care. They could fix it, but they don't. They could clean their own base game files so this isn't necessary, but they would rather force people into the ecosystems of Creation Club.

Well, you certainly haven’t been rushing it so far, considering Fallout 4 released back in 2015…

Permanently Deleted
- In the meantime TES fans are literally dying of old age

Okay. Can you license it to someone else?

Like, you've got an engine, which you paid a bunch of money to develop. But you're only making one game at a time in it, which limits the return. If another carefully-selected studio were willing to use the engine and had Fallout rights, they could put out a game. You did that with Obsidian and Fallout: New Vegas was an enormous success.

They dont even need to use the engine, chuck the IP at Inexile and let them make a new Isometric Fallout game again.
- Or Larian
- and let them make a new Isometric Fallout game again.
  
  Great idea if the game is less polished than bethesda's fallout
The engine is antiquated.
- The Starfield one is fine in my book.
They did. Fallout 76 was licensed to a newly created studio named Bethesda Austin. And Fallout 76 was an on holy disaster on release.
- on holy disaster
  
  unholy
I'll punch you into Obsidian.. Wait what?

Just like they didn't rush Starfield? Well, Microsoft told them to spend another year on it. I can't imagine what that version looked like.

It looked worse than Redfall when that game was released. There was a leaker at that time that said Starfield was absolutely no where close to a game and they hadn't even figured out how to make it fun at all when Redfall went out.
- Wow. Todd must have an amazing contract. Has Bethesda released an actual finished game since...what? Oblivion?

True, but you do need a new goddamn game engine.

I really wish we could go back to smaller scale rpgs that came out more frequently. Tighter, trimmer play areas with efficient stories. They don't need to have tons of side quests with mediocre at best writing. Just pare it down for shit's sake

Yeah it's too late to rush it, everyone has watched the TV show and is now interested in something else.

The longer Bethesda doesn't touch Fallout the better, as I see it.

I want Obsidian to get another stab. I could see them pulling off something great with an improved engine and no sabotage like they got when they developed New Vegas.
- As if they'd let that happen.
  
  The last time they let another studio develop something, it blew expectations out of the water and as a result made their game built on their home engine look like hot dog water.
  
  New vegas is by far the beat fallout game, if for no other reason, it's an actual role playing game, and not an action adventure game.

Todd last month. Todd Howard says Bethesda's trying to 'increase our output' with Elder Scrolls and Fallout 'because we don't want to wait that long either'. Make up your mind, Howard.

Based on 76, Starfield, and the Fallout TV show. The next Fallout and Elder Scrolls games is going to be a shit show.

What was wrong with the TV show? I thought It was pretty good
- It is good. It's pretty bland as well, if that makes sense. I really liked it, but I have zero interest in ever watching it again.
- A lot of the TV show is the world's slowest "unboxing" of the Fallout world. It's a fun ride, but the ultimate reveal is everyone's too busy being out for themselves to make the world better. (Not a surprise to anyone versed in Fallout lore), but without any of the story surprises, lore reveals the acting and story alone aren't really strong enough on their own to call for second viewings.

Of course not they make enough offa Skyrim

I'm still waiting for the Atari 2600 version of Skyrim.
- If nobody beats me to it, I'll give it a try.
- I don't even know if mine still works, but I can't hook it up to the TV right now anyways. Had to get a cheap one with no RCAs. Fuckin Costco.

16x the wait

That’s true and I agree to an extent.. they really need to build a new engine for whatever release is next, starfield proved that the current one won’t cut it. People are tired of these tiny cities and copy/paste dungeons everywhere.

The next big Bethesda title should coincide with the new engine launch if Todd has his witts still. It also shouldn’t be 2030 before we see that new engine..

They just spent five years upgrading their engine. They're not going to use anything else for ES6
- Those upgrades clearly weren’t up to snuff. The game may have ended up profitable but it certainly wasn’t the next Skyrim from community feedback. They dumped a ton of money into it but it won’t have the money printing longevity of Skyrim

Permanently Deleted

They don't want to make it outside of American because reasons. I don't think their current team has the skillset to justify that idea. If it was Tim Cain I would believe he had a good reason. But current fallout writers aren't on par, so why not make it more interesting.
- I think the good reason is that it's a satire of American society during the cold war.
- Let's be honest, a fallout outside USA would render the weapons and ammos as rare as Elon Musk's well thought out tweets
- Writer*
  They have one writer.
Fallout: London will eventually come out, hopefully. It's a mod, but still.
- Permanently Deleted

I hope they'll take their time to make a great game, the best thing that could happen is that they take example on interplay's fallout. Thoses vibes should do a comeback in the franchise.

They might need to rush it but I feel like they gonna do that anyway

You're right.

You NEED to rush TES 6.

If they can't make a game about space ships and hundreds of worlds you can play on fun, then I have zero hope for TES6.
- Problem with starfield is the content was small and sprinkled into an ocean of game. MAYBE with a smaller world to build in they’ll be ok, though I agree, low hope here
- The mod community will just fix it like its done for every other game they've made.

Thankfully 76 still receives fresh and free expansion packs on a regular cycle

ESO does too. Seems like the people that are not in charge of the mainline games know what they're doing.