Wikipedia! Oh please cite the BBC at me. Please cite removed articles with outdated atrocity propaganda. Please cite CNN articles which just regurgitate quotes from Israel's officials as direct evidence.
Did Ukraine take 247 Russians hostages and slaughter 1000 people including whole families and people at a music festival?
Haaretz: “According to [comments by Tuval Escapa, the kibbutz’s security coordinator], only on Monday night and only after the commanders in the field made difficult decisions—including shelling houses on their occupants in order to eliminate the terrorists without knowing whether the Israelis in those buildings were alive or dead—the IDF completed the takeover of the kibbutz.”
An air force colonel said that Israeli airstrikes may have intentionally killed Israeli captives rather than let them be taken to Gaza. Speaking in Hebrew about the airstrikes, Colonel Nof Erez told a Haaretz podcast in November that “the Hannibal Directive was apparently applied” and that 7 October “was a mass Hannibal”
Ynet: Israel fired from helicopters into crowd of festival goers indiscriminately (blamed on “Hamas deception”)
You want casus belli for Al-Aqsa Flood? How about the fact that Israel has been occupying Palestinian land for nearly eighty years (after committing ethnic cleansing), consistently putting up border walls and squeezing in Israeli occupiers in the West Bank, bombing whole villages and setting up chairs to watch, starving people with an inhumane blockade in the Gaza Strip, refusing the right to return, shooting down protestors (Great March of Return), using white phosphorus, imprisoning Palestinians without charge, using Palestinians as human shields, and that they brutally repressed Palestinians at al-Aqsa Mosque (namesake of the operation).
Regarding Ukraine, there was a far-right U.S.-backed coup, Ukrainian nationalists were committing "ISIS-style" war crimes, there was the neo-Nazi targeting of ethnic minorities and Russian speakers, and yet, we must lament the deaths of those celebrating "infinite freedom" on the edge of a concentration camp.
Ukraine's previous president, Poroshenko, and his policy on Donbass: "We will have jobs—they will not. We will have pensions—they will not… Our children will go to schools and kindergartens—theirs will hide in the brments (cellars)."
You need a citation for 8 years of civil war around Mariupol and Donetsk, and the fact that a large number Ukrainian combatants were part of paramilitary groups that were ideologically nazi's, such as Azov or Right Sector?
The Wikipedia article! Lmao. Which accusation? That Ukraine is a Nazi country with Nazi paramilitaries? I made a source document on this a while ago you can read.
You shouldn't store that in a google doc because it can dox yourself and all viewers. As an external party I have no way of knowing which tracking permissions are enabled on the doc.
I come from a different instance with distinct views and I am tolerated here, not all outsider views are shunned here, just irritating, pointless, or historically innacurate ones.
I don't see anger in this discussion personally. People here are well steeped in the common tropes trot out when discussing something like Palestine, we are tired of the same points being brought up that have been discredited numerous times.
You guys show up and act like constantly, and then cry like babies when we reply with
There's plenty of people who try and engage you honestly despite acting like a smarmy jackass but really don't wander in here with your piss attitude expecting to get treated like you're brining free donuts.
I came in here trying to engage honestly, I didn't even bother looking at the instance. You guys responded with this moronic pig butt. I did laugh but I'm finding this entire instance to be hostile and incestuous.
There are other legit comments, and I'm trying to engage them honestly.
Media literacy is dead apparently. Not surprised though. My mom spent two years studying Things Fall Apart with me when I was doing English Literature (and later on To Kill a Mockingbird with my brother). Today she believes the zionist propaganda and believes Palestinians need to be saved from Hamas.
Also I've been aching to make this comment on somewhere so I will make it here:
Pop Culture Politicals after watching TLA: Aang should have killed Ozai. Killing an evil overlord that genocided your people and aims to enslave other nations is not cold-blooded murder, it's self defense.
Pop Culture Politicals when real-life marginalised groups fight their oppressors: Violence is not the answer. Be peaceful like a sterotypical monk.
This is less about media literacy and more about detachment and compartmentalization. Fiction is fiction, it's easier to play and experiment in a fictional space because there are no real consequences. People can easily say "yes I would pull the lever to save the 5 children tied to the railroad track even if it means I have to watch one child be crushed before me due to my action, it's the right thing to do! Just like the protagonist in this story I read." Thing is if you actually stuck them in a freight yard with a bunch of children tied to the tracks they'd probably struggle with the choice a lot more than they did while reading a novella on their sofa.
I think people here really give fiction and media more power than it has, people mostly just consume it for fun. Reading about plucky underdog guerrillas fighting an imperialist occupation is good story telling, it makes for exciting drama. Enjoying that doesn't really translate to having good geopolitical takes, cuz real world drama isn't fun, it's uncomfortable and challenging and can actually affect your life.
For your dumb analogy to make any sense you'd have to pretend Picard supported the Cardassian occupation, like the US which LITERALLY finances the entire Israeli colonial project
If the US had the same policy toward Israel as the Federation had toward Bajor, the Israeli nazi state would've collapsed decades ago
Hamas is no fucking boy scout group.
The Palestinian resistance is currently defending 2 million men, women and children from a depraved army of butchers, rapists, grave robbers and organ thieves
You're goddamn right they're no boy shouts, they're a bush-wacking guerilla army taking nazi scalps
If Hamas wasn't there, a different militant group would be in the lead against Israel. Even on Oct. 7th several militant groups attacked Israel, not just Hamas. So they might not be seen as a "good guy" but they are fighting on the morally correct side.
Israel frames this war as a fight against Hamas but it is against Palestine as a whole. Israeli politicans have funded and propped Hamas up specifically because of their extremism, to divide Palestinians, reduce Western sympathy, and make a more palatable enemy to slaughter.
Are there instances where you don't get a negative response to not answering the question that was asked by delivering obvious (and wrong) information?
I'm saying if you do what Hamas did, you don't deserve support.
Did the slaves in Santa Domingo who wrought terror on old society and killed white settlers not deserve support? How about the American slaves in the Nat Turner rebellion who slaughtered whites? As I've shown, your description of Al-Aqsa Flood is nonsense, but even so the terror of the oppressed is simply a product of the oppressor; violent resistance to Israel is a response to their own violence, of which all of this could be ended by Israel agreeing to end their occupation/apartheid system. Israel has the complete power to eliminate these conditions of oppression that brought Hamas into existence.
You compare Gaza to the Warsaw ghetto and then say those who revolted went too far and lost their legitimacy. Go tell the concentration camp inmates how to correctly revolt so they will be deserving of your support! Ridiculous.
"Why, it was like reading about France and the French, before the ever memorable and blessed Revolution, which swept a thousand years of such villainy away in one swift tidal wave of blood—one: a settlement of that hoary debt in the proportion of half a drop of blood for each hogshead of it that had been pressed by slow tortures out of that people in the weary stretch of ten centuries of wrong and shame and misery the like of which was not to be mated but in hell. There were two ‘Reigns of Terror,’ if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the ‘horrors’ of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the ax compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heartbreak? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves” — Mark Twain, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, Ch. XIII
Yes, it is unconscionable that prisoners in an open air concentration camp would dare to lash out at the group running the camp. That's why Nelson Mandela went to jail, after all.
That's ass backwards post, cause western public hates israel fascist ways, while your post argues in the opposite way (?).
Incidentally. isreal maintains 2 million concentration camp. so any uprising against occupiers is just. If someone had decided to have a music festival near aushwitz, i also wouldn't give two shits about their destiny
Gaza is not remotely Auschwitz. If you want to draw a comparison to the Warsaw ghetto it would be more apt.
And I'm not saying I agree with israel, I'm saying Hamas's mass killing is why a lot of people don't support Palestine. It's why intentionally responses have been tepid on this situation. If October 7 hadn't happened and what's happening today was, I think you'd set much stronger responses.
people don't support palestine because conditions in gaza are not reported in state friendly media, never have been. Running reservation where occupying force is counting calories is very bad.
And 2021 also got mass social media outrage, so what? israel just mows the lawn, no sanctions. March of return? no reaction from "the civilized world".
HRW thinks its apartheid state? Have some pocket change for iron dome.
ICJ finds its a plausible genocide? no sanctions, no nothing. Civilized world protects its settlers through all reason and decency
Media produces outrage what is important to their shareholders, not over what is real.
No, it was much worse. Ukraine killed somewhere around 14000 people, in keeping of course with their pre USSR tradition of protecting the rich by using ethnic minorities as scapegoats. Thankfully there was a Russian intervention since no western country was gonna do it.
Ukraine gets invaded, people support them because it's a war of aggression with no real cause.
Palestine takes an offensive action with mass murder and kidnapping and then gets invaded, I don't think it's surprising people don't see it the same way. It's not the same as Ukraine at all.
People supported the US invading Iraq and Afghanistan even though they were tangentially related to 9/11. 20 years later it's clear that was a shit show and nobody would support doing it over again (the only good was ousting Sadam and Bin Laden).
Back to Israel Palestine. I don't support how Israel is doing any of this, closing the borders was wrong, the mass civilian deaths is wrong, flattening neighbourhoods for "buffer zones" and calls for settlement are wrong.
But there was never any outcome where Israel did nothing, nor ceded their land back to Palestine after this. Hamas's actions could only ever have had the outcome of an invasion.