It is sort of understandable that someone unfamiliar with landback but familiar with the fact that literally all the land in the Americas belonged to Native Americans would completely misinterpret what landback means of you dont specify that returning large amounts of public land is all that has to mean, and that it actually does not mean returning all of the stolen land. Also helps that one of the comments under this comment will be a picture of Hans Moleman from the Simpsons and "I was saying it"
There are like 70+ million settlers in the us alone, they could literally do a human chain around all native Americans on the continent if they truly think that land back is such an threat. Like calm down.
We should do reverse conialism where us anglo Americans get sent back to Brittany to claim "disorganized" land there. Just a few guns and I can claim a tescos for my own and start raising cattle there
I'm kinda confused by these statements. Was there any real expectation that people would willingly hand over the land they committed genocide for to the victims because we told them so? Would Mexican or Black Americans also need to give back any land?
IMO, the white people in this meme give the correct response. That is exactly what you would have to do to get any land or sovereignty back lol.
Hunting for sport doesn't seem like a realistic expectation, and I haven't read up on the topic at all, but like...
If decolonization is enforced, what happens to people like me who've lived in the country since birth? Do we get sent to Europe, or is it just like a new government sort of deal, or what?