My first thought was "If Biden let Texas go and Trump wins the election, Trump would have to invade Texas for oil and give the Texit people (who seem to be mainly conservative) the identify crisis of a lifetime." Would almost be worth it.
We'll have to organize a post-ww2 berlin style airlift to support and supply Austin, though. A coworker of mine from there suggested at least one daily C130 fully loaded with kombucha.
And if any other states leave with Texas - Guam, American Samoa, US Virgin Islands and DC will immediately be expedited in their statehood confirmations. It's a win win all round.
Guam pretty specifically will not, since they have laws saying that only people who are 50% Guam-native or more are allowed to buy land there. That's very much illegal by US law and is a hard blocker to their statehood.
I get why they have that law, but it puts them in a weird position of permanently US-adjacent without ever becoming a full state.
Texas would have to issue its own money, and getting enough money wouldn't be the issue; they could just print it. It will be all the things that come with establishing new money.
California receives more per person according to that data, and California would have the 8th highest GDP in the world if it were a country. This isn't the best metric.
Google Spell Check did me dirty. I was seriously second guessing my pronunciation last night. Not the first time I've caught a word that I had been incorrectly pronouncing for years.
My dark side came out when these clowns started up again. Let’s give the Republican Party just the tip of Texas, ship all willing, then immediately declare war on Trumpistan.
An interesting fact about the US Navy is that all of its battleships have been named after states - except for one which was named Kearsarge (after a ship which during the Civil War hunted down and sank the Confederate raider Alabama). This is why I support allowing Puerto Rico in as a state so long as they change their name to Kearsarge.