Growing up my dad went through a phase of wanting me to limit showers to 7 minutes and I'm still not sure whether it was to save money or prevent jerking it.
sorry kids im 800 years old and momma needs a shower/sauna hybrid to function as a living being. maybe pull yourself up by your bootstraps and stop using water on your golf course thats the size of the moon?
"Water saving baths" are all so pointless because they're too small for me to sit in without impaling myself on a faucet, they may as well not exist but they're becoming the norm here. The rare treat of being in a house with an actually large-sized bath is lovely.
Four minutes does sound rough. I think I can work with 10...maybe 8 but anything less would barley feel worth it. Unless you are rationing water for environmental reasons (fair enough in that case)
A little switch on the shower head that turns the water off while you don’t directly need it can bring the total water running time way down. It keeps the temp constant so you don’t have to fiddle with the knobs every time. Lathering, conditioner leaving in time, shaving, exfoliating, teeth brushing, they don’t need water constantly running.
Or: Don't live in a single family home, but use efficiency from modern apt. complexes. Those can also re-use gray water to some degree and have a much higher efficiency over building lifetime and inhibitor than single homes. You also need less material.
why not 29 minutes? that too would save water, energy and time compared to a 30-minute shower. how did they land on 4? i think “19 minutes” would have looked nice too.
Tough luck, bucko. My lawn patch in the middle of the desert that I use solely for ostentatious display of wealth and not to cultivate isn't going to stay green by itself.