Saw it being QRTd by a few accounts I follow on twitter. But yeah I mean, its a nitter link and a screenshot for a reason. That doesnt boost their engagement.
There's at least a vaguely interesting mismatch happening here. There's clearly the component of violence and likely coercion acted upon her ancestor, but in addition there's an interpretation of somehow being guilty by blood. It's like, no mother fucker, it's not the DNA connection that matters - it's the institutions of power and property that uphold differences even today. What do her "white" distant relatives look like wealth wise comparatively? Why would it be easy for the white relatives to trace ancestry, but comparatively harder for her? The property relations are far more determinate to contemporary conditions than what silly little bit of genetic matter someone has.
I actually watched the PBS show where they did this, she was immediately disgusted by the idea because she understood that the woman who that slave owner had a child with was a slave and obviously slaves can't consent.
I swear if you’re running and profiting from these reactionary baiting cringe accounts you should have to use your public fucking name and have an office that can be [redacted] with them inside it. Never thought I’d say Der Sturmer was braver than the ducking chicken fascists we have today
edited out: Thank you all for the critique, I was wrong and I deserved to be called out on it. I was negligent and did not out the mental effort in to realize how I was replicating reactionary thought patterns. I can and must do better.