"These aren't windows, they're just sophisticated high resolution 3D monitors. NASA has had this tech for decades, they've just never let the secret out. You're not seeing the Earth, you're seeing a video. Why can't we go see it with our own eyes outside? Exactly. Seems very convenient we're being asked to wear suits with image projection helmets."
You will never win with people this fucking stupid.
I think they have this paranoia that the entire humanity turned against their religious belief.
Like what benefit is there to changing the world's shape for nasa, or anyone?
Literally every flat earther is outright retarded.
or will they say that it’s fake and the windows on the space stations are monitors?
But if they did, this would be my guess. They have not used logic or accepted any proof that they are wrong so I doubt they would in space.
Some flat earth guys designed a great experiment to prove whether the earth is flat or round. The only problem was they when their own results showed it was round...
The problem, fundamentally, is that flat earthers don't become flat earth advocates because they have a sane skepticism that what the vast majority of humanity agrees is obvious might be wrong, but because in the thin margin between coming across a "smart" flat earth argument and understanding why it's flawed, they feel special that they "know" they're above the vast majority of humanity.
Being able to design and run an experiment on whether the Earth is flat or not is legitimately cool, and might as well be seen as a source of self-worth, but because accepting the results means suffering the humiliation of accepting how stupidly over confident they've been in the first place, they can't take the small L in order to score the big W.
Many of them will find some way to rationalize it. There was a documentary about an infamous series of experiments some of these geniuses set up - they were obviously consistent with a round Earth, so they dismissed it and started mumbling about mistakes in the experimental design and so on.
You can lead a horse to water, but horses can be intensely moronic animals.
There is enough proof without going to space, so it's safe to assume proof has no effect.
You can always find some superficially credible alternative explanation to any proof. With those, you can use the language of reason and logic to construct a belief consistent with what you had in the first place.
As long as the person has their identity tied to a certain belief, and is of a mindset to find ways in which the belief is correct, they are immune to change. Those are the areas you will need to work on to change their mind.
The spacecraft windows were curved, causing an optical illusion
A few years ago, a documentary on flat-earthers featured a trained geologist who has become convinced that the earth is flat. To test it, being a trained scientist, he designed a good experiment to measure the altitude of a laser beam at a distance from its emitter. He calculated the predicted measurement if Earth is flat and the measurement if Earth is spherical. When he ran the experiment, he got exactly the value he had predicted for a spherical Earth.
The rest of the documentary was him trying to find the error in his instruments and measurements since he knew for a fact that Earth is flat.
Even if you could convince a flat Earther to go to space, I suspect the vast majority would not be swayed.
As you suggest, they'd instead likely say that it's all fake trickery. Even if you gave them a space-suit, put the helmet together right in front of them showing no electronics of any kind, and let them walk outside, they'd still say it was all fake trickery.
They would never believe their own eyes, because they've already made up their minds. An allusion to the Earth being round is an illusion.
You don't even need to go to space to prove the Earth is round. As @Pons_Aelius already said elsewhere in this thread, there was even a show made and funded by Flat Earther's to try loads of different tests, and they ended up rejecting all of them because they accidentally demonstrated that the Earth had to be round.
Their mind is already made, and they'll only accept results that conform to that belief. Anything else is either fake, trickery, or flawed.
Likely that, or something about the windows distorting the image. What you have to understand about flat earth is that it's a religous conspiracy theory. If they accept a spheroid earth, their faith comes into question, and that's not something most prople are willing to let happen.
You are an idiot. It's not a circle. It's a flat rhombus. You're just falling for the circle propagandists, which are backed by the billionaire elites in the Illuminati.
I know a flat earther and he claims that you're looking at a fake view when you're on an aircraft and that it's a hologram. He likes to throw sci-fi words around even though he has no idea what they mean.
Conspiracy theorists don't actually know what they're talking about so they will always come up with some excuse as to justify why they are still right and you are still wrong. Trying to prove otherwise is a waste of your time talking to them is a waste of your time.
If the earth really was flat someone would have worked out a way to commercialize the edge. It has to be useful for something right, waste disposal springs to mind, in any case it would be far more profitable to just publicly announced that the world is flat than to construct this elaborate conspiracy for no obvious reason.
Have you seen the documentary "beyond the curve"? There's a lot of "reasoning" going on, but they dismiss all their own findings that prove them wrong.
There was a flat-Earther called Mad Mike Hughes who tried to build and launch his own rocket to see the shape of the earth for himself. He died in the attempt.
with cameras on weather balloons or iss footage (if they dont outright claim its fake cgi)
they usally blame the camera lens or curved windows, and claim its just the fisheye effect
It started out as a debating group, working with an obviously idiotic concept. Unfortunately it ended up attracting enough idiots who actually believed them that it drove/scared off the original debaters.
It's a fascinating phenomenon, quite akin to religious indoctrination.
Some will some won't. The contrarians will never budge, the "I'm not anti-science, I just don't trust evidence I didn't gather myself" ones should. I suspect most flat-earthers are the former.
I'm assuming they meant we could watch in real time as people made their own version of the truth this time because they wanted so hard to believe they didn't have to get a needle.
It was largely the same style of mental Olympics as flat-earthers.
I think it would depend on the individual. Some would admit it, once they see the whole globe through that glass it would be like trying to say apples don't exist in response to someone handing you an apple. Their senses would override the belief. They might not be very thrilled to admit it...
Then there would be the people that are fanatics about it... They would probably get hysterical, or check out mentally, or get violent, or some other sort of emotional break. I would also guess these people would be unwilling to go into space in the first place.
When they see that the earth doesn't have an edge after a rotation or two they will say "It was amazing, we traveled that same rate the disk was turning so we couldn't find the edge."
well they will still only be able to see one side of it at a time, in their minds they will still think it's a circle, not a sphere, so you can't fix stupid.
Well, according to the Giant-impact hypothesis, a planet crashed into Earth then the debris became the moon we know now, so you could say the moon did land somewhere.