Anon misses the classic design

I've been playing a good amount of disc golf lately. Why not a disc shape?
With proper training, it can be thrown over 100 meters.
It can curve around corners.
It's fun.
It will definitelly hit the very first tree in your path and kill you.
it stacks nicely in a backpack.
- Stacks nicely in a backpack? You know how much crap goes in a medium ruck? How's Jenkins gonna find my stash of disk nades under my spare ammo and 'field stripped' MREs? No, I need my grenades quick access, on my chest next to the repurposed saw pouch full of rip-its.
  
  Okay, but how about both? 2 discs in the backpack (or medium ruck if you want to be german about it) and a waist of ball nades. Then you have options!
- Add some LEDs and feel like you’re playing Tron instead of killing people.
- Make these Bionicle disk launchers but military sized.
  
  Bruh bionicles were the shit I’d forgotten!
- You know how you can throw a frisbee at an angle that makes it come back to you in a straight line?
  An angle that you can easily hit if you try to throw out of a trench...
- No. 4 is proof that you really are a disc golfer.
- heavy.

The traditional hand grenade became the standard for the American military because American soldiers grew up playing baseball, and were extremely accurate throwing grenades the same way. American Baseball gave American soldiers an advantage that European and Asian militaries didn't have.

If I remember correctly, the spherical design was mainly created to resemble a baseball. Since most US citizens knew how to throw a baseball at the time it would mean they didn't have to train soldiers as much
- That is a myth. The spherical form is to maximize surface area to volume for shrapnel, ensuring that no matter how it lands. Shrapnel will go in all directions.
  
  That's definitely a myth. Soviet WW-2 grenades like RGD-5 and F-1 are also spherical and baseball was unknown at that time in USSR.
  
  It's also wayyy more cost effective when you're transporting them. For the Allies, because they relied so heavily on supply lines every cubic foot of space on a ship or truck was important. Carrying a grenade on a stick to the front means not carrying three more grenades. I'm sure four grenades are more lethal than one grenade that a soldier might be able to throw a little bit further.
- So... what were the Germans so used to throwing that theirs had a handle?
  
  Going off of the shape and what I know of Germany today, beer bottles.
  
  Dildos
  
  ~~Axis~~ axes

The reason is logistics (as usually the reason for most things military related). You can fit a hell of a lot more conventionally shaped grenades in a crate than you can with stick grenades. Even on a person, conventional grenades weigh less, are less cumbersome, and you can carry more compared to stick grenades. Stick grenades really only have their ease of throwing over a conventional grenade
- I wonder if anyone in the military has used a sling to launch a grenade.
  You'd want a longer fuse though...
  
  According to wikipedia, the International Brigades used slings to hurl grenades during the Spanish American War. I've heard tell of Ethiopian troops using slings to launch grenades, but can't find a source.
  And I know people have launched molotovs from slings, which are larger and more unwieldy, unless we're talking about the German example above with a handle.
  
  Grenades are mostly used at closer and more hectic ranges, so it's often much faster to just throw it instead of having to prepare some sort of implement to increase range.
  There have been instances of things being used, like slings, slingshots and even devices similar to those things you use to throw tennis balls for dogs. But at the end of the day, the increased range is rarely worth the extra time needed. You would only get an advantage as an opening attack from a longer distance. And for that we already have under-barrel grenade launchers that can reach ten times further than thrown ones, or mortars that could be a hundred times further away from the target.
  
  They used slingshots during WW1, it wasn't great
  
  Or a cistera 😀
  Dungeon Crawler Carl Style
  
  Sling staff to launch grenades?
  
  Just connect the pin to the sling so it slides out as you launch it. It has the small side effect of maybe getting stuck, but hey, nothing is perfect.
  
  just grab a dog ball throwing stick
- It’s easier to pack and ship cylinders than it is to ship oblong spheroids.
  
  You only look at the complexity of the shapes and ignore the total volume used
  
  That's probably partly why the new modular grenade is a cylinder, but that's worse for a frag grenade.

What about one of those long spoony "scoop" type things that people use to throw balls at the dog park?
- The Canadians used lacrosse sticks in WW1
- You mean like a Jailai stick?
  
  You mean like an Atlatl?
  
  It's called a Cesta.

Long wooden handles don't go boom. Wasted space.
The grenade pouch has to be much longer to house them or the grenades are hung on a belt that can cause movement issues.
Throwing a ball is about as easy as throwing a stick. So no point for the stick shape.
Sticks don't go as far.
- Throwing a ball is about as easy as throwing a stick.
  Yeah but the stick goes further because all the weight is at the end so it gets more momentum on the same throwing arc
  
  Eh, the extra momentum probably doesn't overcome the extra weight and drag created by the handle. People are comparing it to an atlatl, but you're throwing an aerodynamic object with the atlatl, not the atlatl along with the spear.
  More than likely the biggest reason is just logistics, extra weight, extra space, additional steps in fabrication.
- Can't roll it into a bunker or small window.
- Upgrade: Splinter attack.
  (Nevermind I saw someone elses comment:) Also i feel like I would be able to throw a stick one further, am I wrong?
  
  I could definitely throw the stick one farther but I have a shoulder problem/disability.
- Yah but how else will you advertise your secret fetish for fascism if you don't get unreasonably hung up on a specific piece of WWII German equipment?
  
  I dunno. Eating human shit?
- but ball can't give anyone pleasure
  
  Not with that attitude.
  
  Just gotta add some strong string.

more expensive building a grenade with a full wood handle and all extra parts is more expensive then ball that go boom

One reason I've heard it's that you can hold the spoon after pulling the pin on a pineapple grenade, but not on a stick
- Plus, these are huge, not easy to carry several in addition to all your other gear.

Interesting question.
The stick design provides leverage for throwing longer distances, but at the cost of additional weight and length, and has been considered obsolete by western countries since the Second World War and Cold War periods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grenade
- Ah, then why not throw them with a sling? All the extra leverage with none of the extra weight, and it's more or less silent. Imagine a barrage of grenades coming in from 200 yards at 60mph.
  
  You could even give it some sort of rocket propulsion.
  
  I've seen slings used to throw things. Either ropes attached to the projectile, or pouches on ropes designed to release the projectile.
  I've also seen those slings not throw the "grenade" 200 yards away, but straight up in the air, or wrapping around branches or arms or flying backwards...
  Slings require just enough skill that they would probably be more lethal to friend than foe.
  They've got the M203 grenade launcher that attaches to their rifle, effective to 382 yards. They've got the M224 mortar that can be operated in a handheld configuration, and is effective from 70 to ~3812 yards.
  
  Just use a drone to drop it two kilometres away instead
  
  Because you have to learn to use a sling and if you're not good you're much more likely to blow yourself up.
  You could probably come up with a more idiot friendly version though some kind of fabric sock where you just launch the whole thing
  
  this is the guy i want on my team for the post apocalypse
  
  Most boringly because most western armies are probably going to use an airplane or tank in that situation. Significantly less risky to have the squishy people hide behind something strong while a machine does the dangerous work from a distance, if you can manage that.
  Grenade is more for close distances, like "just over that ridge" or "in the next room".
- My guess? the stick part blocks the effectiveness of the explosiveness at where ever the stick is point at time of impact. You could argue that to change that would be to make the stick part the actual explosive part and have effectively an explosive baton. But then the ends of the “danger” baton wouldn’t have the same explosive effect to the target facing the end of the baton grenade compared to a target facing the sides of the baton. So, to mitigate that, a sphere shaped grenade would probably be ideal with separable metalic “scales” as a shell. Now you have ideal coverage of the area no matter how the grenade lands at the target.
  At that point, I would assume ergonomics and determining which way was up so that you know where the pin is leads to why grenades look the way they do today.
  
  It's just a bit of wood attached to a fairly big chunk of explosive and I would guess that wood shrapnel is just as deadly as metal within its effective range. The stick isn't going to block much of anything.
  Stick grenades could have a fragmentation sleeve, but they relied more on the explosive concussion for damage, not the shrapnel.

You can also easily string them together into a fancy danger necklace

I doubt you can throw them further. Has a lot more drag and is less dense than modern grenades.
- You are seemingly correct:
  According to the British War Office, the stielhandgranate had a throwing distance of up to 27m while standing, compared to the 35m distance of the more modern and still used M67. Which weighs 30% less and take up 75% less space lengthwise. Even the Mk2( classic pineapple design) reached 30m despite weghing the same as the German one, because it was denser and more aerodynamic.
  EDIT: For anyone curious, the ideal shape among those used and weight for distance and accuray is apparently round and ~300g. Reaching a distance of (38.6±6.5 m) and an accuracy of of (6.9±3.9 m).
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.008
  
  I would assume the ideal design for distance would be shaped somewhat like a glider.
  
  Why not an American football shape, but grenade sized?

They could make a stick that a soldier could put a spherical grenade on to help give extra range. Like an atlatl or one of those tennis ball launchers for dogs.
- Like a Vortex football! They could even put those little whistle things on the sides so they make that sound while soaring through the air
  
  Yeah, we did this, we just made them rocket propelled and called them mortars.
- Balls go further than sticks. Theyre more aerodynamic for a start.
  Dont worry, the Military Industry Complex is all about killing people, so it would be using sticks if it was beneficial.
  
  No he’s talking about those things where you can sling tennis balls with, the ball gets released and the stick is still in your hand. You can throw tennis balls much further with those things
- Like a gun!
- Or a 7 meter long stick, just bob it off

Typical enshitification.

Anon is over-analizing the design.

can give you pleasure
ofc anon thought of that
- Talk about an explosive orgasm!
- I recall a story of an evacuated ER in the UK(?). Bomb squad called because an older man showed up with unexploded ordinance in their rectum. Think it was a WW2 shell in that case but the parallels remain.