Alabama IVF ruling divides devout Christians: 'Fewer children will be born'
Alabama IVF ruling divides devout Christians: 'Fewer children will be born'
After Alabama rules that frozen embryos are children, some fertility patients pray that lawmakers find a solution.
When Alabama's Supreme Court defined frozen embryos as children, the shock and confusion was immediate. Major hospitals pulled fertility services and would-be parents scrambled for clarity on what would happen next.
The debate over reproductive rights in America has long been driven, in part, by opposition to abortion from Christian groups - but this ruling has divided that movement and ignited debate about the role of theology in US lawmaking.
So Alabama's supreme court can rule on mere belief?
“Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory,” Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote.
That's how it looks to me.
I would love to know what this so called justice official's stance is on the Death Penalty; for or against.
I will look it up later as I am being lazy at the moment.
Christians: "Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory[.]"
Trans people: [Exist]
Christians: No, not like that...
Which century is this from
lol you act like judges are impartial
Oppressive theist group argues amongst itself about wha their imaginary friend in the sky wants.
They don’t care what it wants. They care how they can frame what they want to seem like what it wants. What they want is pretty clearly spelled out here: more babies.
Oppressive theist group argues amongst itself about wha their imaginary friend in the sky wants.
Maybe they could exclusively focus on that for a while and get back to us if they ever come to an agreement on whose religion is the only correct one?
Meanwhile the rest of us could get on with the business of progressing society without their constant interference.
As horrendous as this ruling is, I'm also pissed at the pro-forced birthers that are upset by this ruling. It's so intellectually dishonest to object to this ruling when it uses the same justifications they use to oppose abortion.
These people pick issues to be passionate on but never actually put in the effort to research. And not just whether their position makes any sense, but what the downstream effects of the position would mean.
The politicians who write these anti-abortion laws are even more lazy. This is literally their job and they should have seen this coming. They could have put in exceptions for IVF from the get-go but they didn't, because they are more interested in winning points than writing effective legislation.
They could have put in exceptions for IVF from the get-go but they didn't, because they are more interested in winning points than writing effective legislation.
You can't square that circle. If you codify your religious myth that "life begins at conception" into law in order to ban abortions, then you also have to outlaw IVF by the very nature of the procedure.
Or ensure all embryos are born. Either way that's dumb
But they do want to outlaw it. They just didn't want everyone to know until AFTER the election. That way no one could do anything to stop it.
Unfortunately any theology shouldn’t impact lawmaking.
That statement is rather ambiguous as it could be read to mean it's unfortunate that theology can't impact lawmaking, or that it's unfortunate that theology is impacting lawmaking. Theology shouldn't impact lawmaking and the fact that it is is the problem. Republicans have been steadily chipping away at separation of church and state for decades now and we're seeing the impact.
Any hint that a lawmaker is letting religious beliefs dictate their legislation should be an automatic disqualification from office. Politicians shouldn't even be allowed to mention their religion while campaigning. Instead it's becoming de rigueur for politicians to affirm their faith on a regular basis, and we regularly have politicians citing religious beliefs in debates about legislation.
The only part of your comment that I disagree with is "unfortunately".
Fair, my comment was related to the post stating what role theology should play in legislation.
Sadly centuries of tolerating and appeasing the spell casting magic believers has led to this. It wasnt enough that they were allowed to worship in peace. They have decided they are entitled to persecute those not like them and to impose their sharia law on others. Christianity must be abolished with extreme prejudice. It is a cancer hell bent on ending all life on this planet.
As someone who has two living IVF babies, 8 frozen embryos remaining, and is also Christian, this line struck a particularly strong chord:
"Nobody understands more that an embryo is not a child, than the person yearning for that embryo to be a child."
Knowing multiple people who have gone through IVF procedures, and have had it fail time and time again, i felt that as well. They were heartbroken, time and time again.
One lf them has a child on the way, and the other has stopped trying, for those who wonder :)
Who could've foreseen that restricting reproductive rights could go both ways?
I honestly didn't. Assuming devout being synonymous with maga, this headline caught me off guard.
Can I just ask why more babies being born is seen as a moral good? I'm dumbfounded because I've honestly never in fifty years heard this talking point before.
A bunch of white people in the united states are worried about birth rates because immigrant birth rates are high whereas white birth rates are on the decline. They're worried about white people becoming a minority because even though if you asked them they would say no, they know that minorities are treated poorly here.
This is also behind the trans panic and concurrent anti-LGBTQ legislation in conservative states.
Sure, they'll package it with scripture and moralizing, but in the end? It's all about fear.
I'm not white and used IVF. But definitely you are right on the money.
I have heard that there are lot of White people in Europe.
However, many of them are not too keen on moving to USA. For some mysterious reasons. 🤷♂️
Because a man in a book said something about going forth and multiplying
Skip to 0:30 for the relevant bit.
I've seen the interview. You can tell the guy is just completely lost in the conversation.
But my question is this: I understand the assertion that embryos are somehow human, whatever, and I have a sort of begrudging respect for anyone who commits to that and opposes abortion because it is murder. Fine. Like politically and morally I'm completely opposed to that and I will fight them every step of the way, but at least I can understand and respect their commitment. I think it's valid to oppose abortion on those grounds, I suppose.
But if the argument is that abortion is wrong because we need more babies to be born, that is a completely different argument. That one says abortion needs to be illegal not because it's killing babies, but because we have to force women to have babies against their will because babies are good.
And don't come at me with, "they've always just been about control and forced birth" because I know that but I also know there are individual people who are just really committed to the idea of embryos as human life. And the right was sort of constrained by the need to keep that particular wool pulled over those particular eyes.
Is this the moment the mask comes off? I'm just... gobsmacked, really. Killing Roe was the absolute worst thing the GOP could do and everyone knows it. They fucking know it. You would think they would try to settle on making some ground to move the arrow, but walk it back a little bit to cool some of the outrage. But no!
I'm just... this is insane.
What they could go after next:
- Same sex marriage
- Gay sex
- Porn
- Contraception
- Vasectomy
- Divorce
- Interracial marriage
What they
couldwill go after next:They already are. And have been for a very long time.
- Dancing.
- Tattoos.
- Foreskins.
- Shrimp buffets.
- ...
Interracial marriage is safe unless Thomas' wedding goes on the rocks.
Yesterday's Last Week Tonight showed Tommy Tubervile making that realization in real time. It was pretty incredible.
Maybe they should have learned the complete definition of abortion before banning it
This people are so stupid and they make our laws.
"I think the biggest concerns are that people elsewhere forget about us and they think, 'Oh they're just the conservative state, and they're all country bumpkins. Don't worry it will never happen here.'
"And the next thing you know, it is happening in other states that are ultra-conservative."
As a progressive in Texas...fuckin YEAH. Some of us are trying to bring reality back and it's really annoying to get lumped in with the crazies.
I'm a progressive in Arkansas. I understand that 2/3 of our state vote for terrible people who only want to hurt others. That's a huge portion. But 1/3 of us are still clinging to sanity.
Christians have such hypocritical views when it comes to their gods will. If their god wanted a woman to make babies she naturally could
Life is about navigating one's principles versus one's realities.
Xians do exceedingly badly at this in the meta-modern world.
Gotta Love an argument about what god would want while people suffer.
Feel sorry for those caught up in this and I hope some have a light bulb moment.
Leopard's are feasting on faces rn.
It will balance itself out with all the unwanted babies once contraceptives and abortion are banned, and rape is decriminalized.
Spread and populate the universe, sky daddy said. This goes against that