Tesla Threatens Customer With $50,000 Fine If He Tries To Sell His Cybertruck That Doesn’t Fit In His New Parking Spot
Tesla Threatens Customer With $50,000 Fine If He Tries To Sell His Cybertruck That Doesn’t Fit In His New Parking Spot
When he reserved the truck he had a house, but when he got the truck he had an apartment
As a bit of context:
It is not uncommon for high end cars (and that is what they are marketing the cybertruck as...) and even a lot of "prestige" fashion or electronics to have a no resale for N months clause. That is actually "good" because it severely limits the resale/scalping market and discourages people from buying them to flip them.
That said, this is also a textbook example of when you provide an exception. Loyal customer (whether they are or not) who can't actually use a product. Because then you can spin that as "We are a great company, we have your back"
Tesla is only interested in screwing customers out of money and never dealing with them again. It's not a prestige vehicle, it's a defective piece of shit.
Obviously. Doesn't change that this is "normal"
What is not "normal" is that, like all of musk's companies, they manage to fuck up even the most trivial of PR wins.
Gallant would either buy the truck back (maybe minus a "restocking" fee) and use it for parts or replace enough parts they can call it "new" and re-sell it. Or they would coordinate with an influencer they trust to favor them and broker the deal
Goofus tells the cusomer to go fuck themselves and assume they will win on twitter.
As at example why this is a good thing, consider the latest X-Box consoles.
I tried two Christmases in a row to buy new game consoles for my kids, but they were never available. They sold out almost immediately. Some of that was too few being produced, but some was scalpers swooping in to take all stock before customers could. Scalpers would offer some for double or triple the price, but I refuse to support that behavior.
Scalpers directly lead to my frustration on the product, and giving them up, scalpers directly lead to my kids giving up XBox gaming altogether. Scalpers directly led to the entire eco-system losing the profits from a family that likely would have spent way too much, and I’m sure I’m not alone. Everyone lost, except the scalpers.
Retailers eventually started imposing purchase limits to reduce the impact of scalpers, but it was too little too late. the X-Box ecosystem lost customers who will never come back.
And Walmart. Fuck Walmart. I’ve read about the negative impact of Walmart but never had a strong opinion since I rarely used them anyway. But during the Xbox fiasco, their website offered scalper sales at some of the highest markups, their websites falsely reported Xboxes in stock to product finders when it was only scalper ads. Fuck that, and fuck any large retailer who refuses to support Apple Pay because they’re trying to force customers to use their shitty pay system
Yup. It was especially hilarious how many people on the various message boards and discords would talk about "Oh, this is the tenth PS5 that I found to buy for my friends". And there were people dumb enough to think they weren't scalping.
Which was actually nice. The Sony website queues were... bad. But it was tied to a PSN account which drastically limited how many an individual could buy. I am sure that, much like with Valve doing the same for the Steam Deck, is no longer effective because professional scalpers have like 40 accounts they bought a 2 dollar game on. But it made for a much nicer experience.
Lol they could just say you can't sell it for more than the sticker price. This is just fucking the customer!
In theory? I prefer that approach.
In practice? Oh yeah, I totally legally sold my stupidly and unnecessarily expensive limited edition shoes to someone for sticker price. On a completely unrelated note, they gave me an extra 500 dollars for no apparent reason"
"No resale" sidesteps all of that while also removing the bad PR of "and all 5000 cybertrucks were on facebook marketplace two days later".
The issue is not the no resale for N months policy. That is, ironically, more pro consumer than not. The issue is that it is being applied to a shitty product with prototype teething issues where the scarcity was artificially induced due to poor design processes.
Now, if we want to have a DIFFERENT discussion about how most of these "prestige" products are marketed through artificially induced scarcity then... yeah. But in a world where people want to buy something with a ridiculously limited run? I would rather the people fighting over who gets to buy it actually "want" it rather than just the same scalper bots we see in everything else.
A Ferrari or Pagani is a high end luxury car, a Tesla is an overpriced normal car they want to hype up in order to sell it to chuds with more money than sense
I don't feel sorry for anyone buying 250k hunks of shit.
Or for anyone who gives money willingly to a company run like Tesla. They knew who they were buying from.
The manager told Raddon that his situation wouldn’t likely warrant an unforeseen circumstance that would trigger Tesla’s re-purchase of the truck, and reminded him that he signed a Tesla Vehicle Order Agreement which states if a Cybertruck owner sells the EV during the first year, they can be fined $50,000 and be banned from buying future Teslas. According to Business Insider:
This seems sketchy, but then again companies apparently just get to do what they want as long as they can afford enough lawyers.
Raddon told BI that he’s a rule-follower and he doesn’t plan to go against Tesla’s verdict on the matter or hire a lawyer to dispute the decision.
Hahaha!
if a Cybertruck owner sells the EV during the first year, they can be fined $50,000
How is that even remotely enforceable?
It may not be, but it worked on this guy though intimidation since he isn't going to contest it.
The discoloring on the steel makes this car look 10 years older just about a month after it came out of the factory.
Jeebus man. This car is probably the ugliest car after the Homer Simpson design. The concept is even dumber, and it's hard for me not to look down on buyers/owners of such ugly fanboi thrash-ware..
Meh, just post it for sale at 50k higher than what you actually want out of it.
Who exactly wants a used Truck that costs an extra 50k?
Supply and demand. Whenever there is more demand than supplies, there is opportunity for scalpers and flippers to take advantage.
Regardless what you think about the product, the manufacturer or its ceo, protection from scalpers/flippers is good consumer protection.
Well that's on him for buying a big ugly piece of crap from a company with a crazy dumb narcissistic greedy CEO.
Who is also a big player and financier of the new fascist movement
For reference, a U.S.-made Honda Civic is 70.9 inches (1800.86 mm) wide.
A Nissan Clipper Kei Truck is 58 inches (1475 mm) wide.
A pickup truck smaller than a sedan. You can't even buy them in the U.S. unless they're specially imported.
American vehicles are too big. Just way too big.
I would love one of those kei trucks for camping. Solid size and I can have a whole set up in the back. Would you happen to know if there's an American alternative? I've looked into some kei trucks and there's some cheap ones in japan but it would be a fortune to import and I'm not car savvy so I couldn't do my own repairs.
First line of the article reads:
When he reserved the truck he had a house, but when he got the truck he had an apartment
That picture really makes it look like he's just bad at parking
Yeah, if only he tried harder his tail end wouldn't be hanging into the lane...
/s for those who need it.
Isnt SS ( stainless steel ) easily deformed into new shapes with a Hammer and a 2x4 plank?
Just hammer those plates inward until everything lines up inside the lines.
Your done and your welcome!