So, uh, are we gonna have a nuclear war?
So, uh, are we gonna have a nuclear war?
Cuz I wanna know if I need to create and finish a bucket list if that’s the case lmao.
Everyone who is freaking out about Trump getting access to nukes seem to have forgotten that the person who has most inflamed tensions was his successor. Trump posted angry tweets about Kim Jong Un and then met him and hashed it out (Trump is a big racist moron, he "hashed it out" because he suddenly wasn't around John Bolton but was instead around some other guy, but nevertheless the result is that nothing happened). Joe Biden expanded NATO and repeatedly stopped peace negotiations, while at least tacitly approving sabotage of the nord stream 2 pipeline.
If we're gonna have a nuclear war then it'll either be when Trump shits himself to death in the oval office and the psychos under him take over, or it'll be when some sick dem ghoul figures it'll make the GDP rise by 0.2% more than if we don't murder everyone (the calculations are wrong btw)This is probably a weird thread to drop this but it's relevant as any.
"nothing ever happens" is a silly argument. Things absolutely happen, all of the time. Is the cutting off of water and food from Gaza nothing? Are people forcibly drafted into fighting in the Ukraine proxy war nothing? Are the disabled friends and family dying from the deeply misanthropic Covid policies in the west nothing?
Things happen a LOT. They just haven't happened to you ("you" in this case being whatever person genuinely thinks nothing ever happens) yet so you think they can't happen to you. They will and it will probably suck ass.
It's a really dumb shitpost and we should honestly start deleting it.
we better fucking not. i have shit to live for still
who cares? if we do we'll still have to go to work.
"nothing ever happens"
"but chudda, what if-"
"it won't.”
You're asking this in the site that was sure Russia wouldn't actually invade Ukraine
You are missing the point. We are all Russian bots and Russia not invading Ukraine was a psyop to create confusion in NAFO headquarters. Also our next operation is called 'nothing every happen'
No one but the Russian government called that one to be fair
You are missing the point. We are all Russian bots and Russia not invading Ukraine was a psyop to create confusion in NAFO headquarters. Also our next operation is called 'nothing every happen'
Nothing Anywhere Ever At All
I got an online buddy in Russia and they were just as surprised as us tbf.
To be fair, Russia didn't invade Ukraine per se.
Putin just told me that if you go ahead and create and finish your bucket list, he won’t start a nuclear war. That’s his promise to you.
Nothing ever happens
Nothing ever happens gang winning since the Cuban Missile Crisis
can my Nothing ever happens be carry-out?
nuke war no. H1N1 pandemic yes
We have a flu pandemic every year, we just slap the label of "seasonal flu" on top and forget the half a million people that die
New hope just dropped:
Second pandemic distracts the West enough to pull out of their wars.
In order for there to be nuclear war, something would have to happen. However, since nothing ever happens, I do not believe there will be nuclear war.
ah but it would be followed by nothing happening. the end of the end of history followed very quickly by the actual end of history
I'm gonna say not a chance, but then again I also was adamant that Putin would never invade Ukraine, sooo...
Rule #1 of nuclear war is don't live in or near a major city, so I'm screwed.
On the contrary, rule #1 of nuclear war is live directly next to a major target so you get the instantaneous atomization death over the cancer-and-famine option.
Yes, and try and live close to the center of where you think the nuke would be targeted. If it comes, you’ll be vaporized instantly with no awareness. Depending on the size of the nuke, if you’re outside of that radius, you get shockwave, firestorm and fallout depending on distance, and while you will almost certainly die, it may not be quick and painless.
Not everyone in Hiroshima or Nagasaki died instantly
1.) If you see the flash move away from the windows. They're gonna explode like grenades in a second or two. Get down behind something. Once the blast wave passes stay in cover because it's gonna come back from the other direction as the blast wave collapses in to the vacuum created by the explosion
2.) TURN OFF THE GAS. Much of the devastation in Japan was caused by out of control gas fires.
3.) Fill the tub and any containers with water ASAP.
4.) Seal up the house as much as you can. It'll keep some of the fallout outside until it settles.
5.) Cover your nose and mouth. An N95 is ideal but anything, even a rag soaked in water, is better than nothing.
6.) If you're instructed to evacuate move away from the debris plume at a right angle. If the wind is blowing all the fallout south you want to go east or west to get out from under the fallout as soon as possible.
7.) If you survive the initial blast and don't die of radiation poisoning your biggest radiation risk is going to be ingesting irradiated material. Filter all water. Avoid water from the fallout zone. Use bottled or stored water as much as possible.
8.) If you've got them take iodine tablets. This will flood your system with iodine causing your body to pass excess iodine out. This may prevent radioactive iodine from accumulating in your thyroid.
Subscribe to NUKEFAX for more nuclear survival tips!
subscribe
Rule #1 is actually don't live near nuclear silos.
If there is a war, whoever the US will be exchanging with will target capacity for more strikes. So, they will target those sites. I hear many of them are in the midwest and throughout that expanse. So, you shouldn't live in those rural areas either if you're close to one.
Although cities will also be targeted, especially if there are secret nuclear silos that the other country knows about. I have no doubt in my mind they use cities as human shields for nukes.
Dont forget places where airplanes, submarines, and other nuclear-capable vehicles are stored.
Rule #1...
It's far more complicated than that. The nuclear sponge is Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Wyoming.
Welcome to America's "Nuclear Sponge" - Defense One
The United States currently deploys hundreds of nuclear missiles across Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Wyoming. Each missile carries a nuclear payload many times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb, capable of killing hundreds of thousands of people. The Pentagon is now planning to build a new, deadlier generation of these missiles, which are housed in underground silos.
But these intercontinental ballistic missiles, or ICBMs, are not meant to be launched, ever. Not even in a nuclear war. Their primary mission is to be destroyed in the ground, along with all the people that live anywhere near them. Their main purpose is to “absorb” a nuclear attack from Russia, acting as a giant “nuclear sponge.” Such is the twisted logic of atomic warfare.
[Continues]
I thought Russia wouldn't invade Ukraine because it was an obvious trap to ensnare Russia in a quagmire. But now assessing the situation years later, nah, the west is the one who's stuck. Russia hasn't gone full blown war. Didn't occupy. And really is sapping western resources.
It occurs for me that, just as America is run by a lot of ancient Cold Warriors who always thought on some level they could win the big one, there are probably surviving Cold Warriors, including Putin himself, for which NATO encroachment to within a few hundred km of Moscow and 0 warning short range missile launches has been a nightmare scenario for almost seventy years.
I'd never thought about it before, but that might be a big factor in their math. They've got to have decades of worst case war plans for what NATO would be capable of if they completed encirclement.
so I'm screwed.
In the nuclear Apocalypse fuck pile, yeah.
I live just far enough from one of the largest cities and industrial centers jn the US to recieve minor 1st degree burns at best from the Tsar Bomba. Gonna be a hell of a life
At the gay bar
Listened to the song for the first time in forever. Thank you
All I'm saying is we better hope those aliens in the ocean are real, lmao
It's more possible now than a month ago for sure, but I'd still say fairly unlikely. That's a real big move that it seems like Russia doesn't need to take. They could achieve the retaliation they would need with just like a whole bunch of conventional weapons. That being said I don't know shit, I didn't think the war itself was gonna happen. Using a nuke is real extra, if they send one they'd better send em all cause the consequences of using one nuke militarily isn't a situation they could come out of without using enough nukes there could be no retaliation and I don't know if Ukraine is worth that.
This^
Hot take here, I think Putin is a rational actor with actual strategy. One of the few people on the world stage that to me aren't cartoonishly evil, more like a calculated psychopath.
The severity of going nuclear in this situation would prevent anyone but a bond villain with a death wish to even attempt it. It's a valuable thing to remind people.you are a nuclear power but it's fucking suicide to actually set one off. Nukes are more powerful when you don't use them. Once you do you can't threaten people with nuclear war and also are burdened with the apocalyptic reality of following through with it. If limited scale nuclear war were viable without setting off nuclear Armageddon we would have already seen tactical nukes dropped on Iraq.
There's just no way that there isn't retaliation. We're still operating under MAD. Between air force, Navy, and ICBMs, there's too many nukes on both sides that dozens but more probably hundreds of millions of people would die. The entire point of the Ukraine war is to prevent NATO from getting any closer and possibly sticking nukes (or targets that would invoke a nuclear response from NATO) within striking distance such that retaliation couldn't occur in time to sustain MAD. It's very similar to the Cuban/Turkish standoff that occurred at the height of the cold war. I see the change in doctrine more matching the US' first strike policy and Russia trying to assert itself as a world power again. They're putting those words into action with their current military endeavors and diplomatic moves, but statements like these are continuous opportunities for the West to pull their heads out of their asses and recognize the change in reality beneath them.
There will for sure be retaliation but I doubt it'll be with nuclear weapons at least in the near-ish future. MAD, despite its ghoulishness has worked and really us the only way to keep the world in balance after nuclear bombs were invented. It's ugly but it kept Korea, Vietnam and God knows how many places potentially from being a nuclear crater. We know America was down to use nukes at will to get what it wanted before the soviets got the a bomb and fundamentally little has changed in that regard. So yeah, I agree. It's been shown that nato winning the war on behalf of Ukraine is only possible through the destruction of the earth and I don't think it's quite important enough for that. But I also don't think they'll back down without doing something really stupid first.
don't worry OP you can just adopt a survivalist lifestyle. just build a bunker lmao it's not hard. if you're in the states you're double ok because there's a billion guns so everyone can have a decent kit and operate to their hearts content. just remember to bulk order canned food and an israeli civilian gas mask. it will be just like fallout!! or maybe even stalker. how epic would that be?
i look forward to the prospect of becoming a War Boy and dying in a really interesting/stupid way to make the spectacle line go up
The War Street Tyrecoon and his High Finallance Charioteers raising the holy line!
Eh, like 20%.
I hope so. But only in the united states against itself
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has us at 90 seconds to midnight. Not ideal.
This clock is meaningless drivel.
We're really at 2 seconds before midnight if this was updated regularly and accurately.
Imagine thinking the collapse of a nuclear armed superpower is the safest we've ever been
It's hard to envision what's closer than long range conventional mission strikes on one nuclear armed state by another nuclear armed state
Tactical nukes?
The original NYTimes needle
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
no LMAO
i'll leave this advice from the JP case of sonic the hedgehog 1 and 2 for the mega drive
Based JP Classic Sonic quoter
Nice thing about a life that's mostly regrets and people I don't actually like all that much is that the prospect of it all getting atomized genuinely wouldn't be the worst thing in the world
Give it a year and ask again
Right now, I'd say the chances are low but rising
2 months before the neocon warhawks step into office might be a good time for a preemptive strike (I have no idea what's going on).
Im pretty sure the republicans want to pivot Russia against china and not nuke Russia but idk
If it happens I want to be at ground zero.
---
People get ready there's missiles comin'
Get ready like a lover
We got a note from the heart of the darkness
The melody is over
Steady as steel, I want to take the wheel
'n drive you like a rock 'n' roller
Freedom at ground zeroI haven't listened to that song in decades. It's even worse than I remember. It's really crap.
For just a moment I thought it was a different "at ground zero" song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t039p6xqutU
I am surprised King Gizzard hasn't made one, or maybe they did recently, I haven't really kept up. Then again, they already have that track about a cyborg exploding with vomit that consumes the universe, so it would probably be a step down. Pink Floyd almost has one, but it's on the horizon.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
No
Yes, and I'm tired of pretending we're not.
It probably won't happen, but if it does, it'll be in the next two months as Biden goes full accelerationist
Genocide Robinette Bloodfeast
Seems like that's what Bradon is trying for.
It'll be just in time for Christmas.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
nah libs dont have the spoons for that
Death to America
