I dunno if this counts but TurboKid. I've been told by multiple people that they think it's a really cheesy, bad, low budget movie, but I fuckin love it. It's legitimately one of my favourite films. It is campy yes but it's also weirdly heart warming, and also extremely gory in a over-the-top comical way.
Also one of the only post-apocalyptic movies where they actually ride bicycles. You know, as you would (Walking Dead I'm looking at you with your vroom vroom cars)
National Treasure and National Treasure 2. Not much would get me into a theater seat these days, but Nicholas Cage in National Treasure 3 absolutely would.
theres no such thing as a guilty pleasure. you either like it or you dont. saying it's a guilty pleasure is trying to have your cake and eat it too -- you want to establish your taste as too good to like this bad thing, while simultaneously admitting that the bad thing is in fact bad.
I’m also not a big fan of the term guilty pleasure when it comes to media but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say “I enjoy this thing but don’t necessarily think it’s good”
Either because it’s widely unpopular despite you enjoying it, or you recognize it as having little or negative cultural value. “I enjoy watching Law and Order even though I believe it is harmful to society”
OMG, Hackers is such a good movie, gotta watch it again some time.
The Leauge of Extraordinary Gentlemen has this perfect ratio of cool to bad that makes it chefs kiss Also it sucked SO HARD that it got Sean Connery to quit acting.
Based and holy shit I remember that movie! I only remember the scene where they are in a cave and a polar wolf approaches them and does nothing lol.
I got to watch It again.
Bad Boys 2 is a standout action movie for me, I love it. I actually would kind of defend it as a piece of filmmaking... but to say that it's problematic is underselling how vile and cruel it is.
Super Mario Bros. Movie (1993) - Really creative movie tbh, and the cast of Bob Hoskins as Mario is very good.
Escape from L.A. (1996) - Idk why, but I really enjoy this movie even though the plot is just a remake of the first movie but with bad CGI. I also enjoy the soundtrack.
In the Mouth of Madness (1994) - Really good and creative horror movie, too bad they didn't give Carpenter the budget he wanted.
Street Fighter (1994) - Idk, I like this movie and find it very funny. Raul Julia is great.
Resident Evil 1 - 2 (2002 - 2004) - Always liked these two because they at least attempted to include things from the games. The rest are just weird power fantasy movies.
Exposing my ass as a raised catholic, but Prince of Egypt, Dreamworks premiere animated feature about Moses. It managed to humanize the story by grounding the conflict between Moses and his brother the Pharoah, playing up the pseudo-historicity of a christian story that features a lot of literal magic. The songs were bangers, and the cast was absolutely stacked. I also liked a lot of the meta-religious elements as well, such as when the burning bush talks to Moses, it's just the voice of the actor playing Moses, giving it this sorta ambiguity as to how real it might be.
I saw Waterworld for the first time like 5 years ago and thought it was fun.
The Dark Tower I thought was good, but I haven't read the books. As someone not familiar with the series, I didn't mind it, though I would have liked it more as a TV show. Mathew McConaughey is a great villain.
I'm a sucker for Michael Bay movies. I think he doesn't get enough credit for trying to make good movies for as wide an audience as possible. Making something for a niche fandom is a lot easier because you know exactly what they're into. But making something that appeals to 8-year-olds, 20-somethings on a date, retirees looking to kill an afternoon, and for multiple countries in multiple languages? That's a very difficult challenge.
A lot of sequels are good if you just ignore they're sequels and treat them as their own thing. Blair Witch 2 fits into this category. City Slickers 2 isn't as much of a drama as the first, but it's a fantastic comedy.
Speaking of sequels, Jurassic Park 2 and 3 I've always enjoyed. The second one is a bit of a low point, not bringing back a lot of the characters of the first. But how they setup the third with Grant getting conned was a really clever setup. They could have easily made In-Gen the villain again as low hanging fruit.
The Star Wars sequel trilogy is better than the prequels. Both trilogies are nonsensically dumb stories, but the sequels have better acting and practical effects. Large portions of the prequels are boring filler trying to hamfist references from the original trilogy. Solo and Rogue One were where the real Disney Star Wars talent ultimately went, however.
Revenge of The Sith bodies sequels 1v1 but as a box set it's tough
also yeah plus 1 for Michael Bay he kicks ass and he is totally self aware that he makes ridiculous stuff. Watch 'Pain and Gain' - he makes a parody film of his OWN style.
The Dark Tower I thought was good, but I haven't read the books. As someone not familiar with the series, I didn't mind it, though I would have liked it more as a TV show. Mathew McConaughey is a great villain.
I see. I liked honestly the entire first trilogy of the JP movies. Jurassic World was kinda meh and I didn't finish It's sequel because I got bored of It. I feel like It should have been a standalone reboot movie tbh.
I do agree with Rouge One and Solo, I loved those tbh. Andor is pretty good too. I only liked the first Star Wars sequel movie tbh, The Last Jedi bored me tbh.
The prequels are just entertainingly bad. I feel If instead of Lucas directing It and someone else did they would have turned out great.
Also unrelated to the movies but I got a Lego buildable figure of Jyn from Rouge One that I got as a kid lol.
Honestly? Eight Crazy Nights. Empathizing with Davey as a youth kinda helped me to start understanding what the hell was wrong with my own gray matter after a while-- besides, there really isn't that much pop culture cruft for Hanukkah of all things. I think Adam Sandler was the one person trying.
i unironically think Morbius is a decent capeshit flick that reminded me of 2000s capeshit like Iron Man 1, coupled with randomly funny and bizarre choices every now and then like fucking Jared Leto in general and giving Matt Smith a villain dance scene
it's just legit not a bad film it's easily a 7/10 movie
i guess Trap (2024) too it honestly brought Shyamalan back onto my radar for me, loved that shit
honestly tho idk if this qualifies bc i don't secretly enjoy them im very public about these
Hell yeah, I came here to post about Hackers, so happy to see it in the OP. Such an incredible time capsule of 1995. Johnny Mnemonic is also pretty good as one (1995, the year your Hollywood soundtrack had to have at least one song by Stabbing Westward on it).
Most 80s action movies are both terrible politically and objectively as movies, but damn if they aren't entertaining.
Maybe not so much "bad" as they are "disliked by many", but I have a soft spot for Terry Gilliam films. I grew up watching Baron Munchausen and Time Bandits frequently.
Plenty of people also seem to dislike Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain, but I love that shit.
I will die on the hill that Super Mario Bros. Movie (1993) is actually a good movie and anyone who says it's bad is wrong.
Anyway as some may already know the answer final fantasy spirits within, idk if people consider chronicles of riddick bad but it definitely wasn't a success and I've watched it several times. High profile commerical failures are usually my favourite things cos I'm a hipster
I dunno if Home Alone 3 counts as a bad movie but it's one of my favorite childhood movies. I had the VHS & it was one of my go-tos when I was allowed to pick a movie to watch.
It's also where I learned the word "broad" without really learning what it meant, I got in trouble for calling my sister one lol
I like Scorseses jesus movie Last Temptation of Christ (1988), which I understand had some mixed reception
Controversy
Terrorist attack
Main article: Saint-Michel cinema attack
On October 22, 1988, an Integralist Catholic group set fire to the Saint Michel cinema in Paris while it was showing the film. Shortly after midnight, an incendiary device ignited under a seat in the less supervised underground room, where a different film was being shown. The incendiary device consisted of a charge of potassium chlorate, triggered by a vial containing sulphuric acid. The attack injured thirteen people, four of whom were severely burned, and severely damaged the cinema.