Rhodesia was the last attempt at a rebirth of philosophy. An aristocratic, militaristic, pastoral peoples installed themselves on the local farming population outside the confines of the global NWO
Lenin in Imperialism: The Highest Stage Of Capitalism dug a quote out from Cecil Rhodes (a disgusting colonial piece of shit) who said:
I was in the East End of London (a working-class quarter) yesterday and attended a meeting of the unemployed. I listened to the wild speeches, which were just a cry for ‘bread! bread!’ and on my way home I pondered over the scene and I became more than ever convinced of the importance of imperialism.... My cherished idea is a solution for the social problem, i.e., in order to save the 40,000,000 inhabitants of the United Kingdom from a bloody civil war, we colonial statesmen must acquire new lands to settle the surplus population, to provide new markets for the goods produced in the factories and mines. The Empire, as I have always said, is a bread and butter question. If you want to avoid civil war, you must become imperialists.
The imperialists have understood for a long time to prevent socialist revolution they must by all means have new lands, new markets, new pools of cheap labour to rinse to placate the workers in imperialist nations.
Hahaha this is the brain wormed moron who said there was nothing to stop him and his buddies from showing up to a peninsula, enslaving the locals, gaining a demographic majority, and "establishing an aristocratic regime".
The peninsula in question? Kamchatka.
Yeah bro, the Russians are famously chill about people coming to annex their land. Nothing the Russian Federation and their hundreds of thousands of tanks and artillery pieces could do about some idiot trad bros showing up in a boat.
Who would win, a flotilla of chuds on fishing boats with AR-15s, or the entire Russian Pacific Fleet?
Hell, one small patrol boat with a stabilized autocannon mount could probably hold off an almost infinite amount of boats with small arms.
Edit: Lmao I just looked it up and even small Russian corvettes mount a rotary AK-630 that spits out at least 4000 30mm rounds a minute. Here's a 30mm round side by side with a NATO 5.56
He probably thinks they're all inferior peasants who would be easy to subdue for ultra masculine trad men like him.
Personally, I would think twice before challenging people who eke out a living on one of the most inhospitable places on earth on their home turf, but I'm just not trad enough.
My first thought was: "yeah sure Cabana Boy with a palm in nickname would enjoy the freezing climate of Kamchatka", and then he just say global warming 5-10 degrees as if that was just air conditioning turning on. Holy crap what a disgusting moron.
It's easy! All you have to do is to show up with your buddies and subdue the local (nuclear-armed) population. And there's even a defensive land bridge! Surely, the Asiatic brainpan cannot conceive of the concept of boats and planes.
that shouldnt be hard, since ukraine will be in yekaterinburg by christmas, and putin will have a lot more to worry about than some peninsula in the far east.
Yeah, I'm sure that land bridges will come in handy when a Su 25 drops an explosive package on your head.
This people are so sheltered they truly believe only white people can prosecute air campaigns, reminds of the Ukrainian foreign legion who got their shit pushed in by an air raid
No, no, no. You see, they were a nation of Chads. They were all six feet tall and had perfect hair and razor wits. Their smiles sparkled like the sun, and they could single-handedly plow a 10 acre field in under an hour. They were as stalwart as they were wise. They could all speak sixteen languages. They were God's Chosen People.
So, anyway, a force of locals overran their government within a matter of months. No one can explain exactly how it happened (:-| ), but their entire empire vanished from the earth seemingly overnight. Some say they angered the gods with their hubris. Others think it was a (((fifth column))). It is even rumored that Rhodesia was laid low by an early incarnation of TikToks and the first generation of rap music.
All we know for certain is that their immaculate, almost magical people served as the high water market of white western civilization. And if we strive to be everything that they were, perhaps we can recapture that moment in the sun once again.
I didn't even know what a "rhodesia" was until someone posted a FN-FAL on /r/guns and all the comments were full blown fashposting. That plus the "roof Korean" glorification made me wonder if there might be something wrong with that place
Roof Korean has always been a euphemism for shooting black people, despite the end result of the roof koreans during the Rodney King Uprisings in 90s Los Angeles those same roof koreans being shooting other koreans including eachother
Hence why every discussion around black/brown people protesting/doing civil unrest includes morons saying that they need roof koreans or whatever
I have very mixed feelings about the Roof Koreans. While their imagery has definitely be coopted as a canard for the fantasy of anti-black violence, there has also been some recent attempts to invoke them as the only well-known example of Asian-American armed self-defense in the background of increasingly fanatical anti-Asian racism in the US.
I don't like the fact that they're being used to stoke inter-minority violence, but I also don't like the fact that some people are using them to try to convince Asian-Americans against the necessity of organizing and arming themselves.
I'm not in favor of torturing people, but it's okay to make these people sing "rhodesians never die" under threat of losing progressively more digits, and when the song is over shot them to prove it wrong.
"Intelligent, cruel, astute, born to command, refined, courageous."
Wait, internet fascists are straight up admitting to loving cruelty? Usually they try to cover up their brutality with euphemisms and blatant lies. They love pretending to be morally superior smol beans. What gives?
I think this weirdo may have read some Nietzche. Calling the people in his ideal society "cruel", "born to command", and so on, and clearly meaning that in a positive way is giving off massive Nietzche vibes.
even then it makes no sense, Nietzche never said cruelty was good?? Like the whole idea Nietzche developped from what I read was that if you've got strenght you should use it and enjoy it but he only meant strenght as in, good health, since he himself was frequently ill and often bed ridden. Or maybe im missing something here?
Most fascists are petit bourgeois, and always aspire to be one of the elites that run the country. It's not surprising they imagine themselves like this.
It is true that a rogue slave state with an entrenched elite is pretty close to the environment that produced the Greek philosophers. They just forgot the piracy.
Rhodesia was a white supremacist settler colony. Just keep that in mind when reading any source and it should be pretty easy to weed out the bullshit because any bullshit will be trying to ignore or downplay that.
All these people have ever done is make me like the idea of a new world order more. Critical support for Carl Schwab and the WEF or whatever in their quest to make guys like this shut up