They'll just do the usual retort that obfuscates the entire question by appealing to the abstract social nature of labor. If you're only at one spot on the assembly line and you contribute to a small part of the manufacturing of the commodity, it's a lot harder to measure how many commodities you make a day, since you never really make an entire commodity with your hands the way an artisan would. Someone milks the cow. Someone bottles the milk. Someone screws the cap on. Someone puts the label on. Someone makes the bottle. Obviously it's even more complex than that, but this is a simplified example. If a process of making a commodity is divided into 5 separate jobs, each worker only creates on average 20% of the commodity at a time. So if a given individual in that process does their job 100 times they really only "created" 20 commodities. And at this point the question becomes abstract enough for people to not really know exactly how much they're individually doing for the capitalist and it becomes harder for them to measure whether they're being paid the full value of their work or not. Intuitively of course most people know they aren't, because otherwise profit and hence surplus value/surplus product couldn't exist. And collectively the workers definitely are getting less than they give on average.
More like Russia in the 1890s. Dude is speedrunning the conditions for a communist revolution to the point im beginning to suspect he's a left accelerationist.
The crazy libertarian is resorting to payments in kind. I guess the next step for him will be building a barter economy and having taxes payable in corvée labor.
Based on commentary I've heard from communists way more well read than me I'd say no, though it was what I thought of immediately when I heard of bringing back payment in kind.
My imagination is informed that way based on reading of stuff in the Middle Ages like the Byzantines having a flexible tax policy after conquering Bulgaria, with the allowance of payment in kind.
the “Kubrick Stare” is one of Stanley Kubrick's most recognizable directorial techniques. A method of shot composition, where a character stares at the camera with a forward tilt to convey to the audience that they are at the peak of their derangement.
Always has been. it's just that instead of being a wage slave in exchange for money they're being a wage slave in exchange for commodities. "payment in kind" I believe it's called
"This level of optimization has not been done by any other runner in the category for quite a long time. Cementing Milei's run in the REDACTED any% category as the greatest of all time."
it's even weirder than that. Serfs paid a corn rent (a portion of their crop) to the feudal lord and in exchange weren't kicked off the land or tortured or executed. Milei is paying workers in milksteak wages 🤮 and demanding full days of labor in return
How long until it becomes standard practice to save on overhead by simply combining the workers foodpay into a homogenous, shelf-stable nutrient slurry?