These 9 House Republicans voted against a resolution condemning the Russian abduction of Ukrainian children
These 9 House Republicans voted against a resolution condemning the Russian abduction of Ukrainian children
In recent months, a majority of the Republican Party has firmly turned against providing further US aid to Ukraine.
- The House passed a resolution on Tuesday condemning the Russian abduction of Ukrainian children.
- Nine Republicans voted against it.
- It comes as a majority of the party has firmly turned against providing further US aid to Ukraine.
Here are the 9 Republicans who voted against the resolution:
-
Andy Biggs of Arizona
-
Eric Burlison of Missouri
-
Warren Davidson of Ohio
-
Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
-
Clay Higgins of Louisiana
-
Thomas Massie of Kentucky
-
Matt Rosendale of Montana
-
Chip Roy of Texas
-
Tom Tiffany of Wisconsin
You know, far be it from me to tell the FBI and the NSA how to do their jobs, but maybe, like, they should be investigated.
(who am I kidding. Feebs. do your fucking jobs and arrest these traitors.)
I’m pretty sure Marge is the Capitol pipe bomber, so they should probably have a discerning look at that while they’re at it.
I’m not sure there’s enough evidence to support the idea that MTG is the culprit, but boy does my heart flutter on the wind of a song at the idea of her getting caught somehow and having a meltdown as she is dragged away to jail.
There was a sting the FBI ran years ago that caught a bunch of politicians red handed, good times.
That disgusting hate-filled creature MTG just has to be on the moral wrong side of absolutely everything, doesn't she?
I would posit she's an AI creation of the worst congressperson possible, but AI isn't good enough to get things wrong/right that consistently. She's a miracle of abhorrent nature to be this wrong this often.
When hallucinations become the wanted output
Ah yes, the pro-child-trafficking wing of the Republican party.
"Family values" on display again.
Am I allowed to call them traitors as a Canadian?
I can understand not voting, but to vote against. That’s wild.
These 9
House RepublicansRussian Assets, voted against a resolution condemning the Russian abduction of Ukrainian children.There fixed it.
Condemning the Russians committing the warcrime of genocide by abducting Ukranian children.
Any overlap with them and the officials who went to Russia on the 4th of July?
Ugh. Warren Davidson of Ohio. I know people in his district. He’s a shithead. Took over for John Boehner, and carried Boehner’s tradition of being the second-shittiest Rep from Ohio, after Jim Jordan of course.
Remember when we thought John Boehner was the most orange shithead in the Republican party? And then Trump was like, "hold my Adderall."
Permanently Deleted
Removed, not because the word itself is inherently offensive, it's not. It's because the people who use it over "begrudgingly", "stingy", or "miserly" never do it out of good faith.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/niggardly
"The words niggard and niggardly are etymologically unrelated to the highly offensive and inflammatory racial slur euphemistically referred to as the N-word, despite the words' visual and auditory resemblance to it. Because of that resemblance, however, both niggard and niggardly are often taken to be offensive."
🆗
The idea was to use their biggotry against them, but apparently using words as they're intended is too much now ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
After all, they're witholding their support on a resolution out of spite.
just to set the record straight..
I use the word, specifically to point-out that it's UNrelated to the n-word.
WHEN we kowtow to disinformation,
THEN we are accommodating disinformation's rule.
Fight it tooth & nail, ever mm of the way.
Ideological disinformation, national-narcissism disinformation, historical disinformation, linguistic disinformation, Scientism's disinformation & other pseudoscientific disinformation, ALL of it.
What's their reasoning though?
I think it goes something like this: "If I vote against Russia's interests, Putin might release some of the abundant kompromat he has on me."
Ju$t feel$ right.
To prove to the other Republicans that their voters don't care at all, they can just do whatever they want and will still get re-elected.
I tried checking their Facebooks but none had mentioned this bill.
Using congress to “condemn” things is ineffective virtue signaling.
There's certain votes where we should just flush the nay's down the toilet. This is one of those.
Thats because Republicans are pedophiles and child traffickers and they tell us every day
Permanently Deleted
Not a single brain cell amongst them.
I found it hard to recognize this woman in this photo. She is usually hollering like a wild monkey while harassing other religions or children victims of school shootings. This one is a different expression for sure.
Greene is the only one on that list that I expected to see. I'm shocked that only 1 name I expected to see is there.
Guess Gaetz was busy, giving a deposition. Or shopping in Russia.
From what I've read recently, Gaetz allegedly likes children.
I expected to see Andy Biggs on there, he's a piece of shit.
Marjorie Taylor Greene? Say it ain’t so!
Check their bank records. We’ve found out who’s on the take.
I bet you'd find Russian money in the accounts of a lot more Republicans than these 9.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
On Tuesday, the House overwhelmingly passed a resolution to condemn Russia's abduction of Ukrainian children in the two years since the war began.
Sponsored by Democratic Rep. Susan Wild of Pennsylvania, the resolution holds the Russian government "responsible for the wrongful and illegal kidnapping of children from Ukraine" and states that doing so "amounts to genocide."
Since the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, thousands of children have been abducted and taken into Russia, and it's unclear what's happening to them.
The Republican votes against the resolution come as most of the party has gradually turned against providing further US military aid to the besieged eastern European country.
Most Republican senators voted against a $93.5 billion aid package that includes more than $60 billion for the Ukraine war effort, and House Speaker Mike Johnson has thus far refused to hold a vote on the package, in part owing to fears that doing so could turn hard-right Republicans in his own conference against him.
Meanwhile, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson has promoted Russia's image via a recent trip to Moscow, including an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin that even some GOP lawmakers tuned into.
The original article contains 284 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 31%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Just another day in the office.
If only we could have passed that condemnation, those kids would be okay.
How many congress members are condemning israel kidnapping over 140 Palestinian children from the west bank and torturing them?
Selective outrage strikes again.
Selective outrage strikes again.
{Pats top of head and rubs stomach at the same time}
Selective outrage strikes again.
Yep, you've yet again attempted to whataboutism your way into a different conversation.
You have a seriously selective outrage towards one specific issue and will find a way to just cram it in anywhere, wontcha?