The Star Trek universe is not communist, although it is often misunderstood as such. Here are some arguments against it:
Private property exists: Characters in Star Trek own personal items like clothes, PADDs (Personal Access Display Devices), and other belongings. This contradicts the communist ideal of common ownership of the means of production.
Currency exists: Although the Federation claims to be a post-scarcity society, there is evidence of some form of currency, such as "credits" or "gold-pressed latinum," which are used for trade with other civilizations.
Social hierarchies exist: In Star Trek, there are clear social hierarchies, such as ranks in Starfleet, different positions in government, and various social classes. This contradicts the communist idea of a classless society.
Individual freedom is valued: Characters in Star Trek have the freedom to make their own choices, pursue their own careers, and hold their own beliefs. This contrasts with the communist idea of collectivism, where the individual is subordinate to the good of the community.
Replicators do not create abundance: Although replicators can produce many goods, they cannot replicate everything, such as latinum or complex technologies. This means that there is still scarcity, and resources are not unlimited.
Competition and rivalry exist: In Star Trek, there is evidence of competition and rivalry, for example in scientific discoveries, sporting events, or political debates. This contradicts the communist idea of cooperation and shared progress.
The Federation is a democratic republic: The Federation is depicted as a democratic republic, where citizens elect their representatives and participate in political decision-making. This is fundamentally different from communist systems, which are often one-party states with limited political freedom.
Although Star Trek presents an idealized vision of the future where many social problems have been solved, it is important to emphasize that it is not a communist society. There are many elements in Star Trek that contradict the basic principles of communism.
I've seen someone make the distinction on here where private property is factories means of productions and such and personal property is the stuff you own including things like your home
Characters in Star Trek have the freedom to make their own choices, pursue their own careers, and hold their own beliefs. This contrasts with the communist idea of collectivism, where the individual is subordinate to the good of the community.
Meanwhile, capitalism: "Oh, you decided to go into the arts? Have fun starving. Should've gotten a tech degree."
Lab grown bait. Each point is inconsistent in its perspective of communism. One says they're are officers so its not a classless society, another says its not a one-party system so its not communism.
Captain Fredrick Marx of the U.S.S. John Brown: [looks directly at camera] The Federation does not use money. We no longer strive to collect material things. The necessities of life, including education and access to information, are freely and universally available. We have eliminated poverty, hunger and curable diseases. Hierarchies, such as the chain-of-command on starships, are rare and only used when necessary; civilian life is highly meritocratic. Federation society is not perfect, but it is an improvement on what came before.
Isn't that an almost verbatim quote? I swear either Picard or Sisko said something along those lines either to a time traveler from the past or while they were timetraveling to the past themselves.
Picard talking to 20th Century Capitalism Man in "The Neutral Zone"; Picard talking to Lily in the movie "First Contact"; Troi talking to Mark Twain in "Time's Arrow"; Kirk in 1980s San Francisco saying "They're still using money," in "The Voyage Home" -- plus a whole lot more. So yeah, you're absolutely correct.
This is also why the first person to stop clapping went to gulag. It wasn't because Stalin was egomanical, it was because he believed everyone deserved exactly the same amount of applause as everyone else.
Sitting around in my utopian spaceship being mad as hell all the time because 24th century Dengists are keeping the government from coming and stealing all my clothes
I think Star Trek is not exactly communist but very advanced phase of socialism, defined by two main factors:
It became one not because revolution but because WW3 destroyed a lot of capitals and demolished a capitalist class, so it failed to recover before aliens came and brought tech transfers rendering capitalism obsolete and preventing restablishing of the capitalist system (mainly free energy and replication tech making scarcity nearly nonexistent).
There are hostile reactionary imperialist forces in the galaxy. Therefore state is still needed.
Under Star Trek to play baseball you need a holodeck, a crew you can orde to play baseball and a college rivalry. To play Ambo Jitsu you have to beat up your dad.
That's funny because when I say I want that stuff everyone calls me a Marxist. Who the heck is this Marx guy and why does he keep stealing all my good ideas?
This seems like obvious satire based on the first three. I stopped reading once they hit 3/3 and gave the reason while "missing the point" or whatever. Honestly could've ended after they used private and personal property interchangeably- it's either blatant satire or the most libbed up lib ever who purposely reads Marxist literature to then act "educated" while typing the dumbest shit possible. Gonna go with satire to protect my brain.