How to help a person who has bad times remembering commands when using Linux.
I'm a Windows user of all life. But I love Linux. And these last two years after so many time I started learning it in deep . But one thing is bugging me is that I am those persons that has bad times remembering names, words... imagine commands... Even after using it so much I remember some basics but I'm struggling a lot and I have to go back to notes constantly to do some basic operations. Even worst after trying multiple distro from from different upstreams that commands are ... Different. What would be your recommendations to help me. Are there tools to help this issue ? My guess is that A LOT of people happens the same. And it's one of the reasons Linux has such a slow adption . Because is excellent and full of capabilities.
It happens to you, to me and to every UNIX user since the 70s. Your system is (or should be) full of docs and tools to get help. One thing that I noted over the years, when we have new people at work, is that they don't known how to get help from programs or they don't known how to get help from their systems and when they struggle with anything, doesn't matter how basic, they go to the web for help. I always show them this: aproposmanhelp
What was that command to compress files?
apropos compress
Oh! it was gzip
What was that command to do whatever with the GRUB?
apropos grub
Oh yeah! update-grub
What about that command to download files?
apropos download
Oh! it's wget
The next tip should be learn how to use and navigate in the man pages, man have it's own man page;
man man
There are different sections, section 1 is the default, you don't need to specify, so you can just;
man bash
But if you want to get help from configuration files you should type;
man 5 sysctl.conf
Also, almost every program have a built in help compiled with the program code, you usually call it with --help or -h, sometimes just help and other times just call the program without parameters and it should print it.
Other people already suggest the cheat sheets, very useful especially for programas like vim or emacs, some of them come like a template to create a cube, so you print it and then craft it (like an origami) and you can have it in your physical desktop.
Last thing; be patience, your are in the rigth path, there's always more than one way to do things, you just need to find your own way.
I made a comment about how easy it was to learn VMS was (an 80s/90s OS). How do I print a file? I'll try PRINT. Okay, that works. How do I make 6 copies? PRINT /COPIES=6. Great! But how do I print to a file? I'll try PRINT /OUTPUT=filename. Well whaddya know!
I loved that OS like a brother. Sadly it eventually went the way of every proprietary system.
This reply made me smile. You are not going to believe me but I'm a millenian.... and I worked with OpenVMS (yes, you guess rigth, in a bank). May I tell you? Yes, sorry;
2012, first week as a SysAdmin in that hell bank, I made the mistake of saying "My fetish are old OS and computers" (this is true), "Well, we have this four VMS baremetal machines that nobody wants to touch and if they fail we fuck up all". After learning to be quiet and don't speak too much I found a VMS manual in TPB or some other site (I remebered downloading it as a torrent) and started using the pre ones (two of this machines where pre and two prod). I found that AWK was installed and a POSIX Korn Shell was sleeping there and nobody knew it, with only that I did a lot of stuff like Nagios custom monitoring (yes, this machines wasn't in the monitoring system, if there is not a red dot isn't broken) and automated things like the IPLs. I'm not going to say that VMS is a brother, but I feel comfortable with it even for a UNIX admin. The best part of this boring story is that, some months ago I was chatting with one old coworker that is stills in that bank, they still have this machines and they still use my shitty scripts for monitoring and getting data and statistics, can't believe (and a little proud of) that a OS that was developed before I was born is still up and running my programs.
I use a snippet manager called keep.
It runs in the terminal, and helps remember commands. I use it for remembering commands with lots of flags and parameters that i don't use often. But it can be used to remember any command you need.
You can also add comments to each command to remind you what it does.
I add the command i need to remember with keep new
And when i forget it i can run keep list
To get a list of commands.
It can do more, but i've only ever used those two functions.
Find a cheat sheet. There are hundreds out there -- you probably want one for basic terminal commands, and one for whatever package manager you're currently using.
The history command is also great if it's something you do fairly often, but not often enough to remember clearly.
I think 90% of the comments here are “write your own notes“ - which is possibly over simplistic.
Everyone's different but IMHO:
The brain is better for imagination than long term storage. So if you're stuck trying to remember some obscure command(s), it's just better to use something else to store that on.
But when the brain understands the core concepts well enough, the details come together as habits (where repetition comes in).
So, if you're unable to recall something, take some time to think / remind yourself about the underlying concepts and why that's the command - next time it'll be easier, eventually it'll be effortless.
I had to learn some strange concepts for work during a deep technical troubleshooting session on a client's system and the commands were like just facemashing the keyboard... I've no idea what those commands are now (written down), but I can recall what / why I was doing them and that was the key... for me.
This. If you do a search for Linux command wallpaper, you'll find a version I used to get myself going.
My old team was a small windows team and a large *nix team. I was always scrounging for work, and I had been playing with Linux and bsd/Mac for a awhile. My manager added me to the patching team with a shadow. I was good within a few months for most things.
It's best if you have a goal in mind, like with programming.
Unless you want to increase productivity in specific field (say some kinds of software development) you won't even need to remember anything more than cat, ls etc. In those specific usecases you'll become habituated to the command you use frequently, nobody becomes a grep ninja on day 0.
Whenever I need something mildly complex with ffmpeg or imagemagick, the right command is just a web search away, I rarely remember syntax of these anyway. I find commands less obvious and harder to find for windows shell (technically powershell is cross platform btw), but maybe that's because I'm not much familiar with windows-ism'
Tip: whenever you encounter a useful command syntax/one liner, save it with brief description. I find konsole's built in quick commands quite handy, some other terminals probably have such features too. Otherwise a simple markdown list is enough.
Linux users are obsessed with the command line because it's faster if you can type fast and remember everything. If you can't, GUIs are actually much much faster because you are visually guided towards what you're looking for and have to spend little time looking for the correct commands and syntax and everything.
because it’s faster if you can type fast and remember everything.
No. That's just wrong. You only need to type ONCE and you don't have to remember it all, that's why reverse-i-search (aka Ctrl-r) is so powerful. It allows you to search within your command history so you only need to remember few letters of the command (which you can annotate, e.g. commandname parameter #it does this) and can even edit after, e.g. changing parameters.
But, more fundamentally, that is NOT the point of the command line!
The whole point of the command line is... to be able to repeat things, namely to script actions that can be customizes and combined to YOUR unique needs. So it's absolutely not about typing speed or memory. In fact, once I do have a good command, what do I do? I save it as a script precisely so that I do NOT have to type it again. Think of commands as Lego bricks that can be combined to together, build on top of. That is basically impractical with GUIs. Sure there are some tools to automate the click on GUIs but it's unreliable, nor can it be easily shared.
PS: I'm not saying anyone should use the command line over GUIs. I'm not being prescriptive. I'm only trying to clarify what the point of the CLI is.
TL;DR: command line is about combining tools to your unique needs, repetitively and reliably.
True of course. If you look at my comment though, I haven't said that speed is the point of the command line. Just that Linux users are obsessed with it. For most users most of the time, the repetition/automation is not the point and ability to write scripts is not the most important thing. And you can combine tools with GUIs as well, it's just slower. Same with reliability, GUIs don't have to be and usually aren't unreliable, so command line only has the automation and speed going for it.
you only need to remember few letters of the command
I believe that is exactly the problem in this thread. The command history only works if you remember in the first place.
I have been using Linux since the mid 90s. Exclusively since about 2005.
I am obviously getting old now. But my willingness to remember the structure of rarly used commands/options. Has always been limited. If its not something I do often. It generally involves looking up man pages. And more often then not a GUI is just faster.
GUI has improved hugly in the time I have been using Linux. To the point that now it really is quicker if I'm not already in the terminal.
But as soon as things get to the multiple command level. Or complex enough that looking up is needed anyway. Typeing is just faster. Being all in one window makes a huge difference. But also once things get to the need to look up point. Command lines are just easy and quick to share online etc. So it tends to be the easy way for forums etc to share guidelines etc.
For all GUI has improved. Text is still one of the easiest ways to share data. It allows things to be organised and jumped around from point to point.
I am teaching an ex GF to use a new Linux PC for the first time. (Put it together as a wedding gift)
I tend to tell her to switch between GUI and command line as best suits her. As long as you understand the goals of each step write or wrong is whatever seems easiest for the user.
But it is important t to become comfortable with the terminal. Because this is how others will share info. And she will need to be able to understand what they are telling her to do.
Online trolls still exist. So understanding things like
But some things are just easier in CLI, especially if you have to do that thing often.
The other reason to use the command line is automation, it is very easy to write a bash script and run it as often as needed, if every day at midday you want to update something CLI is much easier.
e.g everyday at 2am, my rsync script runs to backup my important files.
e.g 2, I have a small script to combine all the pdf's in the current directory into a single file using pdftk. It is so much faster than any graphical way.
Of course, I didn't make some kind of point about the general use of GUIs and CLIs, I just said that GUIs are much faster if you can't remember commands, which is the problem in this thread.
That's really the best I can give you. The more you use the commands the easier they come to you.
Even novices can struggle with the command line. Don't be afraid to search online for answers. I still need to look up arguments for things that I don't use daily and I've been using Linux for almost 20 years now. Duck duck go and man are your friends.
One thing that I have found nice is using a shell that remembers what you have typed in the past because sometimes I will remember part of a command but not the whole thing, for example fish shell remembers commands and will start to auto fill commands that are typed as long as I have the beginning of the command correct and as long as I have typed the command in the past, which works wonders when you're doing similar commands but with different file names or you are trying to remember the more advanced portions of git
A side note that I want to add regarding alternative shells be aware that every shell has its own strengths and weaknesses, for example fish shell is amazing for auto completion and plug in support, but it's downside is it's not compatible with standard bash Scripts and scripting as a whole on it is pretty mediocre
Print out some of the various CLI cheat sheets and pin them to your wall by where you work on your computer.
Maybe this one:
Then, print a page with commands you commonly use, either with more complex syntax or that aren't on the sheet. (Like, "ls" is on there, but "ls -s -h" is not, for example.
Idea 2:
Write bash scripts to automate some of your commonly used tasks. Comment them. Imagine someone else is going to have to use them, even if you're the only one who's ever going to look at them. Not only will this help you learn lots of commands and force you to describe what they do (which will help you retain the information), it will be there as a record of how it works that you can go back and look at months or years later, to remind yourself how to do something.
Yes, write automation. This will lead you to learning new commands that solve problems as you go. Debugging until they work correctly also helps make them more familiar. This is the best way to learn for sure. At least in my own experience, could be different for you, but I strongly suspect this’ll work well.
I remember the basic filesystem commands like ls, cp, mv, rm, cat etc, but I generally don't remember much more than that. Even so, I still use the GUI file manager/software center pretty often, there's no reason why I have to force myself to use the terminal all the time.
I have an app on my phone to search for commands that I barely use and don't remember. Don't worry that much about it if you aren't a professional system administrator or other such jobs.
First of all, we are ALL in the same boat. Newcomers from whatever OS to professionals alike, we all struggle to remember commands and their idiosyncratic syntax.
Now that this is out of the way, namely that you are not "special" in having difficulties there, a little challenge. How do YOU normally do when you are learning something new? Typically when people do that, e.g. at school or while doing a professional training, they take notes. Are you doing that? I know it might sound "strange" but learning Linux is... well fundamentally learning so yes you can use whatever tools and techniques for that too. So... here are MY notes https://fabien.benetou.fr/Tools/Shell which will probably be rather pointless to you but at least prove that I'm not suggesting something I didn't try first.
TL;DR: yes, use all the tools & tricks recommended here (IMHO with reverse-i-search first) but don't forget to actually take notes!
You could make aliases that are easier to remember for you.
If you e.g. had trouble remembering that mv does a rename, you could alias rename=mv. Ideally just put whatever you would have googled in "linux command to x" as the alias.
That's the power of Linux; you can tweak everything to your preferences and needs.
Wild had no idea—this is so cool. If you do this, does the original command also still function (so like I could rename to something easier for me, but hopefully transition to the real deal at some point/ properly follow help forums or suggested pasted commands)
It is possible to override existing commands with aliases though. This is useful for setting flags by default. I have alias ls='ls --color' for instance such that whenever I run ls, it actually runs ls --color, providing colourful output.
Note that aliases are only a concept within your command line shell though. Any other program running ls internally won't have the flag added and wouldn't be able to use any of the other aliases either (not that it would know about them).
It's very easy to program your own "proper" commands though on Linux. If you had some procedure where you execute multiple commands in some order with some arguments that may depend on the outputs of previous commands, you could write all that as a shell script, give it some custom name, put it in your $PATH and run it like any other command.
Back in the ancient pre-Internet days I worked for many years with a system called VMS made by Digital Equipment Corp (aka DEC), now long gone. VMS was a dream to use - every command and option was an actual word, and you could abbreviate commands and options any way you wanted, As long as you were unambiguous, it would figure out what you meant. So easy to learn, and felt so natural. Based on that alone I thought VMS would become more popular than Unix, with its cryptic commands, and those single-letter options that are sometimes the first letter of something obvious and other times seem totally random. But internally VMS wasn't structured as well - for example, piping output from one command to another was possible, but it wasn't geared for that like Unix is. There was also no free version of VMS, and it only ran on DEC hardware, so not that many people even knew about it. The dawn of Linux for PCs was essentially the nail in the coffin for VMS. But I do miss that CLI.
That will return all commands you've typed that contain that keyword. Helps if you remember part of a command, but can't remember the specific flags or the proper format.
If there are common commands that you use over and over, turn them into a Bash script and name the script something descriptive.
I do that for long commands that I don't want to type out, like my whole system update workflow: sudo apt update -y && sudo apt upgrade -y && sudo flatpak update -y
I saved that as a Bash script and called it "update.sh" then I saved it in my home directory. Now whenever I want to do a full system update, I just type ./update.sh and it asks me for my password, then updates my whole system without me having to do anything else. I do this with several different tasks like my remote Ansible server updates.
Other than that, you can buy/make a linux command cheat sheet with the most common commands. Keep it with you or next to your computer. Look at it whenever you need a refresh.
Use ctrl-r a lot (navigate up/down with ctrl-p and ctrl-n) and try to "fuzzy-match" previously used commands.
There is a very useful command called fzf which, while only a search program at heart, can be configured to complement this nicely.
That's an interesting little program. Not sure if it's for me - I'll either remember/lookup commands or create bash scripts for more complicated things - but it's good to know about.
I partly remember the first letter and press arrow up.
I use ZSH shell with oh-my-zsh.
It autofills the rest with history at the point you write. So arrow keys make you scroll through the history which is beginning with the thing you wrote
But I still prefer ZSH because of shell language being incompatible with fish. I dislike learning that thing, when I have everywhere new Linux shells with bash
you don't need to remember anything, except commands you use the most often but even then it becomes muscle memory after a while. If you ever need some specific command to use, just look it up online.
Then use the commands help or read the local man document. In example for grep it would be grep --help and man grep. You don't need an online connection for this.
Keep a "cheat sheet" of common commands printed out nearby-- either something from the internet and/or a custom one for your own commands.
Also, nobody can remember all the commands. We mostly just remember the ones we use most often. Otherwise, we have to look things up! It's not too bad since you know that the command exists and you just need to know the exact way to type it.
Find mnemonics to help remember certain things. For example if you want to decompress a .tar file, you remember "xtract zee file" or: tar -xzf
There's nothing wrong with notes. I keep a text file open permanently at work and home with all my notes in it. I have a bunch of commands in it to copy-paste. Or Ctrl+r and type to search the history.
But if you want to memorize, I usually use flash cards.
I currently use Bytestash. Used to use Obsidian, but the fact that all I have to do is pull up a webpage to copy and paste a command I need made ByteStash a better fit for me.
How often do you need commands you cant remember? The ones i use are typically memorized via regular use, or i just look it up for the one off ones. You can use some distros without ever touching the terminal too if thats what you prefer.
I'm also not a text first person. There are a lot of us about.
I have found GUI applications to do most commands I need. Most IT users don't know them, as they've never searched for them.
I pin the apps as Favourites in the launcher, to help remember my processes. The apps typically keep the last used values, making them quite productive.
I was a Mac user for 35+ years (still am, partly). It took me a little while to get used to new names/commands in Linux but that's to be expected. And it is not much an issue anymore ;)
I am those persons that has bad times remembering names, words… imagine commands… Even after using it so much I remember some basics but I’m struggling a lot and I have to go back to notes constantly to do some basic operations. Even worst after trying multiple distro from from different upstreams that commands are … Different
What kind of commands exactly? I mean, I don't know that 'commands' are different from one distro to the other' as they all use the same apps. So, beside the name of a few specific ones (like, maybe the app installer).
What would be your recommendations to help me. Are there tools to help this issue ?
My two sole advice:
don't try to remember too many commands. Instead, focus on the ones you use daily or very often. After you get those memorized you can always decide to memorize more... or not memorize them at all. I don't bother remembering them, why would I when I can easily use Ctrl+F and instantly find them the moment I need them?
How do I do? I keep a text files in which I store all the stuff I seldom use but still want to be able to find in case I need it someday. To make finding them easier, I put descriptive titles and comments with each command. And that's what I'm searching for, not the command name ;)
If you're talking about Terminal commands, learn to create your own aliases they will let you remember a short name instead of full commands. I have a few lengthy commands and some scripts (for example, to compress/convert images) that I I regularly use. I don't remember them. I've saved them in a .sh file that I can either call through a Terminal or simply by a right-click in my File Explorer (it's Nemo and they're called 'Actions', on Linux Mint)
Anything you have trouble remembering, or just find yourself doing often, create an alias (or bash script if it constitutes a multi line command). Name the alias something you can easily remember that also lets you know what that command does.
Then, and here's he trick, don't rely on the alias. Use it when you can't remember, say "aww, damn it I had to use the alias again", and then use which followed by the alias name to see what the command was again. Do this over and over and eventually some commands will stick.
Ones that you don't care about or are just super long, just keep using the alias and don't worry about remembering them. Use aliases as both commands and notes.