I still cannot get over the Vogue photoshoots. Like - ok, so his wife is in several outfits. This means that she had time to change, do makeup, pose, etc. But so did Zelensky, considering he's in the pictures. They also did interviews for the magazine. These things don't get wrapped up within an hour.
In other words, for some reason Zelensky chose to remain in his "relentless commander who's too busy with war to care about appearances" persona even though it's clear that he had ample time to do all that for a fucking photoshoot. Who the hell is falling for this propaganda? Westerners, of course, but surely Ukrainians see the first lady in expensive, elaborate outfits and their president in a tshirt next to her and think "this guy is fucking annoying." My only other guess is it's pushing the subconscious narrative of the unkempt warrior male who's too busy with violence so that females can stay safe and worry about makeup and hair.
He's doing the Steve Jobs thing, something all great men do. Don't you get it. Steve Jobs, Zelensky, and Norville Rogers. Great men, single outfit, frees the mind for more important decisions.
The reason he's always in those faux military outfits is because zelensky has more sponsorships than a formula 1 driver, and rumours are a neo-Nazi clothing company (CW: lots of Nazi imagery in that article, obviously) set him up with a deal to wear them.
I too can find a bombed out ruin to do my staged TV interview in.
The real question is, what are these room-temperature IQ chucklefucks gonna do when their lord and savior Voloooodymyr Zelenskyyyyy gets summarily executed by Azov?
Nah, the mainstream media is already putting out "Ukraine not so good no more" articles, it's an activation code for Libs to stop stanning them so hard. That way when the more blatant fash take over more overtly they can morn the loss of Zelensky and abandon Ukraine guilt free.
If this was flipped Redditors would be saying "Russia is bombed out and poor and clearly don't have the money to continue the war, and Ukraine is comfortable and easily winning."
Yes, a true man of the people, skimming off the top of billions of dollars of military aid, looking the other way as NATO expends the lives of thousands of his citizens to make line go up. Very humble leader!
Putin: WW2 was Poland's fault because they didn't give their land back to Germany, who rightfully owned it.
Tucker: crickets Of course!
I watched the interview when it came out, and I keep seeing this same bullshit propaganda about it. Putin talked about it for all of 45 seconds and said that Poland refusing to give up the Danzig corridor to Germany provoked Germany to attack. That's it.
All these people who have "favorite moments" are just making shit up lmao
waaaaait at first glance it looked like they'd gone to some rubble-filled ruin to do the Hardcore Jornalism Interview... but that's just wood. for fireplaces. y'all could just be on the other side of that wall in that intact (except maybe windows?) building
westerners have said that it’s compromised by Russia, but regardless both countries use it heavily to communicate news, propaganda, and just everyday texting.
It's mostly posts of him holding some speeches about "We will win against the invaders" and "Our noble brigades are doing the Lords work" or videos about meeting several countries leaders, paired with emotional music.
I follow it out of curiosity. Now let me just see if I can find that screenshot of his deleted post with the Nazi imagery...
hey, hey everyone, hey, this is interesting as fuck, look at these two pictures i pulled out of my ass, isn't that interesting as fuck? updoo5 that shit hive mind you know what to do
I feel like this whole set dressing thing zelensky does doesn't really work once I can talk to an ukrainian in the west of that country who is like, fine. I mean shits dire and all but they're not all living in bombed out rubble.
A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on Teddit and Libreddit, which are Reddit frontends that protect your privacy.