It is the weird intersection of internalized homophobic and liberal hypocritical behavior. It is super gay to be judgemental of women's bodies. Which is fine. It is super weird to try to untangle the normative emotions around this.
Watch them complain that this is an “unchristian” design a couple years later and then the next thing will be calling for the restoration of the Haye’s code.
I'm half-convinced these guys have managed to work each other up into a state where you could show them a picture of Soul Calibur 4 Ivy and they would say she wasn't booby enough
I will never get why the GOP calls for the restoration of the Haye’s code, but also wants to ban any design of female characters that doesn’t violate their “family values” stances.
Gemma is the new forge character in the upcoming game Monster Hunter Wilds. A lot of reasonable suspicion that she's the grown up version of little miss forge from Monster Hunter 4U
i don't think that's what cleavage means? doesn't it just mean yknow, visible boobs, which they are? isn't seeing the bottom which is obscured by a shirt called "underboob"?
He's complaining that she's wearing an undershirt - the orange "cleavage blocker" under her white partially unbuttoned shirt - and it is obscuring his view of the buttcrack cleavage he expects to be on display for him.
These types are really just the end result of porn brain. It completely skewers your mind as to what a natural woman looks like and overconsumption can turn you into this weirdo.
Honestly this shit seems to go a bit beyond just "porn brain", like the women in porn are... actual women. Yes generally very attractive ones but ones that exist. This is more like... hentai brain, idk.
Just hedging against "actually, attraction is a subjective experience" by vaguely waving your arms at some "widely held" conventions no one can provide documentation for.
Societal beauty standards are a real thing... They aren't completely organic, set in stone, or inherently good or valid or anything like that but they do exist
I don't think documentation is really necessary when pretty much all media in the US portrays white, young, thin, slightly athletically toned, clear-skinned, white-toothed, symmetrical-faced people with societally-approved matching gender characteristics as "attractive". Characters who exhibit those traits are portrayed/coded as attractive, and they are the people put in front of the camera on things like the news. Just saying "attractive" when talking about someone with those features is basically saying that anyone who does not have those features is inherently not attractive, when in reality many people have different opinions on what they find attractive.